Introduction: Healthy piglets ventilated with no positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and with tidal volume (VT) close to inspiratory capacity (IC) develop fatal pulmonary oedema within 36 h. In contrast, those ventilated with high PEEP and low VT, resulting in the same volume of gas inflated (close to IC), do not. If the real threat to the blood-gas barrier is lung overinflation, then a similar damage will occur with the two settings. If PEEP only hydrostatically counteracts fluid filtration, then its removal will lead to oedema formation, thus revealing the deleterious effects of overinflation.

Methods: Following baseline lung computed tomography (CT), five healthy piglets were ventilated with high PEEP (volume of gas around 75% of IC) and low VT (25% of IC) for 36 h. PEEP was then suddenly zeroed and low VT was maintained for 18 h. Oedema was diagnosed if final lung weight (measured on a balance following autopsy) exceeded the initial one (CT).

Results: Animals were ventilated with PEEP 18 ± 1 cmH2O (volume of gas 875 ± 178 ml, 89 ± 7% of IC) and VT 213 ± 10 ml (22 ± 5% of IC) for the first 36 h, and with no PEEP and VT 213 ± 10 ml for the last 18 h. On average, final lung weight was not higher, and actually it was even lower, than the initial one (284 ± 62 vs. 347 ± 36 g; P = 0.01).

Conclusions: High PEEP (and low VT) do not merely impede fluid extravasation but rather preserve the integrity of the blood-gas barrier in healthy lungs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056428PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12810DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

high peep
12
volume gas
12
positive end-expiratory
8
end-expiratory pressure
8
healthy piglets
8
piglets ventilated
8
peep
8
ventilated high
8
peep low
8
blood-gas barrier
8

Similar Publications

Introduction And Objectives: High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is an increasingly popular mode of non-invasive respiratory support for the treatment of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). Previous experimental studies in healthy subjects have established that HFNC generates flow-dependent positive airway pressures, but no data is available on the levels of mean airway pressure (mP) or positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) generated by HFNC therapy in AHRF patients. We aimed to estimate the airway pressures generated by HFNC at different flow rates in patients with AHRF, whose functional lung volume may be significantly reduced compared to healthy subjects due to alveolar consolidation and/or collapse.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Viral infections are the main cause of acute respiratory failure in infants, which can progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with high morbidity and mortality, so it is essential to imple ment strategies that prevent this progression. Recently, it has been proposed that increased work of breathing would not only be a warning symptom during the evolution of acute respiratory failure, but also a mechanism for the progression of injury, both lungs and diaphragm, coining the concept of patient self-inflicted lung injury. Since the first reports of ARDS, the usefulness of the use of con tinuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been raised, a non-invasive respiratory support therapy with wide access and low cost, capable of improving oxygenation and work of breathing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: Intraoperative lung-protective ventilation strategies (LPVS) have been shown to improve lung oxygenation and prevent postoperative pulmonary problems in surgical patients. However, the application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-based LPVS in emergency traumatic brain injury (TBI) has not been thoroughly explored. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of drive pressure-guided individualized PEEP on perioperative pulmonary oxygenation, postoperative pulmonary complications, and recovery from neurological injury in patients with TBI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Win Ratio approach for the composite outcome of postoperative pulmonary complications: Secondary analysis of a harmonised and pooled database of three randomised clinical trials.

Eur J Anaesthesiol

December 2024

From the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Monash University (ASN), Department of Intensive Care Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (ASN), Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (ASN, NSC), Pulmonary Division, Cardio-Pulmonary Department, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidad de de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil (ASN), Pulmonary Engineering Group, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany (TB, MgdA), Department of Anaesthesiology The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (SNTH), Department of Anesthesiology Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands (SNTH), Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut D'investigació August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona (CF), CIBER (Center of Biomedical Research in Respiratory Diseases), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid (CF), Navarrabiomed-Fundación Miguel Servet, Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Pamplona (JL), Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, Hospital IMED Valencia, Valencia, Spain (MS), IRCCS San Martino Policlinico Hospital (LB), Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy (LB), Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe (GM), Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria la Fe (GM), Department of Statistics and Operational Research, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain (GM), Division of Intensive Care and Resuscitation, Outcomes Research Consortium, Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Integrated Hospital Care Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA (MGdA), Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands (MS), Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand (MS), Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand (MS) and Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK (MS).

Background: The win ratio analysis method might provide new insight on the impact of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on clinical outcomes.

Objective: The aim is to re-analyse the results of the 'Re-evaluation of the effects of high PEEP with recruitment manoeuvres vs. low PEEP without recruitment manoeuvres during general anaesthesia for surgery' (REPEAT) study using the win ratio analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Postoperative extubation is a critical phase. Various medications and different ventilation modes are employed during extubation to minimize potential issues. This study aimed to observe the early effects of the concurrent use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and pressure support ventilation (PSV) modes during the extubation-emerge period on the respiratory system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!