Background: Many existing scoring systems assess ankle function, but there is no evidence that any of them has been validated in a group of patients with a higher demand on their ankle function. Problems include ceiling effects, not being able to detect change or they do not contain a sports-subscale. The aim of this study was to create a validated self-administered scoring system for ankle injuries in the higher performing athlete.

Methods: First, 26 patients were interviewed to solicit opinions needed to create the final score, which is modified from the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Second, SAFAS was validated in a group of 25 athletes with and 14 athletes without ankle injury. It is a self-administered region specific sports foot and ankle score that contains four subscales assessing the levels of symptoms, pain, daily living and sports.

Results: The Spearman correlation coefficients between SAFAS and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) ranged from 0.78 to 0.88. Content validity is established by key informant interviews, expert opinions and a high satisfaction rate of 75%. Cronbach's alpha indicated good internal consistency of each subscale ranging from 0.77 to 0.92.

Conclusion: SAFAS has shown good evidence for being a valid instrudent for assessing sports-related ankle injuries in high-performing athletes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2013.02.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

foot ankle
16
ankle injuries
12
ankle
10
ankle score
8
sports-related ankle
8
ankle function
8
validated group
8
development validation
4
validation sports
4
sports athlete
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!