MR elastography of the liver: defining thresholds for detecting viscoelastic changes.

Radiology

From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.B., P.F.C.G., J.S., A.J.N.) and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (A.D.N.), Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and INSERM Department of Radiology, University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM UMR 773, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Clichy, France (P.G., R.S.).

Published: December 2013

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to find out how to measure important changes in the liver using a special imaging technique called MR elastography.
  • They tested 30 people, including healthy volunteers and patients with liver diseases, to see how consistent the measurements were taken at different times.
  • Results showed that moving the patients for the tests made the measurements less reliable, and specific percentage changes in liver properties indicated when there were significant changes.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To define thresholds for detecting significant change in liver viscoelasticity with magnetic resonance (MR) elastography, both for whole-liver measurements and for voxel-wise measurements in relation to spatial resolution.

Materials And Methods: This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and all participants provided written informed consent. Thirty participants (16 volunteers and 14 patients with hepatitis B or C; 18 men; median age, 30.4 years; age range, 18.9-58.6 years) underwent imaging twice while in the same position (intraimage reproducibility), after repositioning (within-day reproducibility), and 1-4 weeks later (between-weeks reproducibility). MR elastography parameters comprised elasticity, viscosity, attenuation parameter α, and propagation parameter β. Bland-Altman analysis was used to calculate repeatability indexes for each parameter. Analyses were performed in a region-of-interest and a voxel-by-voxel level. Voxel-wise results were calculated in relation to spatial resolution by applying Gaussian filtering to establish the optimal trade-off point between resolution and reproducibility.

Results: For elasticity, α, and β, within-day and between-weeks results were significantly lower than intraimage results (P ≤ .018 for all). Within-day and between-weeks results did not differ significantly. Over-time changes of more than 22.2% for elasticity, 26.3% for viscosity, 26.8% for α, and 10.1% for β represented thresholds for significant change. The optimal trade-off between spatial resolution and reproducibility was found at a filter size of 8-mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) for elasticity and propagation parameter β and at 16-mm FWHM for viscosity and attenuation parameter α.

Conclusion: Repositioning causes a significant decrease in the reproducibility of MR elastography. The propagation parameter β is the most reliable parameter, with an over-time threshold for significant change of 10.1% and the ability to reproduce viscoelasticity up to a resolution of 8-mm FWHM. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13122669DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

propagation parameter
12
thresholds detecting
8
relation spatial
8
reproducibility elastography
8
viscosity attenuation
8
attenuation parameter
8
spatial resolution
8
optimal trade-off
8
within-day between-weeks
8
parameter
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!