This study investigated the extent to which manual fluency was associated with speech fluency in fluent speakers engaged in dual motor tasks. Thirteen right-handed adult females repeatedly drew circles with a pen on a digitizer tablet under five conditions: (1) a baseline (without reading or listening to speech), (2) reading fluently, (3) reading disfluently, (4) listening to fluent speech, and (5) listening to disfluent speech. The primary measure of disfluency was normalized mean squared jerk (NJ) in the pen strokes. Pen stroke time (ST) and pressure (PP) were also measured. NJ of the circle movements was significantly increased in both the disfluent reading and the disfluent listening conditions (p<0.05), compared to the baseline condition. In the fluent listening and reading conditions, NJ in circle drawing was unaltered compared to the baseline condition. Relative to baseline, ST increased significantly (p<0.05), but to a similar extent in all experimental conditions. Significantly (p<.05) greater pen pressure were also found in the disfluent versus fluent conditions. Positive correlations (r=0.33-0.63) were found between NJ and ST across conditions. These findings demonstrate that in dual-tasks, speech fluency can influence manual fluency. This is consistent with the corpus of data showing neural connectivity between manual and speech tasks, as well between perception and production. The mirror neuron system is implicated as a mechanism involved in forging these links.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2012.12.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

listening disfluent
8
disfluent speech
8
listening
5
speech
5
manual disfluency
4
disfluency drawing
4
drawing producing
4
producing listening
4
disfluent
4
speech study
4

Similar Publications

Partner-Specific Adaptation in Disfluency Processing.

Cogn Sci

August 2024

Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University.

Speakers tend to produce disfluencies when naming unexpected or complex items; in turn, when perceiving disfluency, listeners tend to expect upcoming reference to items that are unexpected or complex to name. In two experiments, we examined if these disfluency-based expectations are routine, or instead, if they adapt to the way the speaker uses disfluency in the current context in a talker-specific manner. Participants listened to instructions to look at objects in contexts with several images, some of which lacked conventional names.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Gesturing during disfluent speech: A pragmatic account.

Cognition

September 2024

Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. Electronic address:

People are more likely to gesture when their speech is disfluent. Why? According to an influential proposal, speakers gesture when they are disfluent because gesturing helps them to produce speech. Here, we test an alternative proposal: People may gesture when their speech is disfluent because gestures serve as a pragmatic signal, telling the listener that the speaker is having problems with speaking.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Previous studies have shown that individuals who stutter exhibit abnormal speech perception in addition to disfluent production as compared with their nonstuttering peers. This study investigated whether adult Chinese-speaking stutterers are still able to use knowledge of statistical regularities embedded in their native language to recognize spoken words and, if so, how much acoustic information is needed to trigger this information.

Method: Seventeen stutterers and 20 typical, nonstuttering controls participated in a gating experiment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The adaptation effect in stuttering, traditionally described as the reduction of stuttering moments over repeated readings, provides a context to investigate fluency facilitation as well as a relatively controlled means of comparing fluent speech in the immediate vicinity of words that were stuttered versus fluently produced. Acoustic studies have documented decreased duration of fluent speech during adaptation but rarely address changes in disfluencies or the speech preceding or following the disfluencies. This study addresses this gap in the research by documenting frequency and duration changes in both fluent and stuttered syllables.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

One fish, uh, two fish: Effects of fluency and bilingualism on adults' novel word learning.

Psychon Bull Rev

April 2023

Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 476 Waisman Center, 1500 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.

Listeners utilize speech disfluencies to anticipate novelty in spoken language, but little is known about how speech disfluencies impact novel word learning. We investigated how monolingual and bilingual adults learn novel words under disfluent speech conditions, focusing on fillers such as uh and um. If fillers highlight novelty, they might be an especially potent cue during word learning; however, because fillers also signal uncertainty, listeners may be less willing to learn in a disfluent condition.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!