A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Donor-site morbidity of free fibula and DCIA flaps. | LitMetric

Donor-site morbidity of free fibula and DCIA flaps.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg

Oral Surgery, Hospital Kulim, Ministry of Health, Kedah, Malaysia.

Published: September 2013

Purpose: This study evaluated and compared the long-term donor-site morbidity of the free fibula flap with the deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) flap in maxillofacial reconstruction.

Materials And Methods: Thirty-four patients (19 in the fibula group and 15 in the DCIA group) were evaluated for long-term morbidity. All clinical data were analyzed, including primary disease, type of defect, type of flap, length of bone harvested, total blood loss, operating time, length of hospitalization, and postoperative unaided gait. Subjective evaluation included cosmesis, function, and pain. Objective evaluation included physical examination, neurosensory assessment, Stony Brook Scar Evaluation, gait assessment, and goniometric measurement of range of movement.

Results: In the subjective evaluation, no significant differences in cosmetic outcome, functional loss, wound healing, or pain between the 2 groups were noted (P > .05). However, neurosensory deficit was worse in the DCIA group (P ≤ .05). In the objective evaluation, 4 patients (27%) in the DCIA group had neurosensory deficit in the lateral thigh region. The DCIA group had a better Stony Brook Scar score (median, 5) than the fibula group (median, 4; P ≤ .05). However, there was no difference in walking ability between the 2 groups (P > .05). Goniometric measurement showed a significant difference between the operated and unoperated sites in the 2 groups; however, it was not severe enough in either group to affect patients' function. In the fibula group, 7 patients (38.9%) had claw toe deformity and 2 patients (12.1%) had weakness of the great toe, and the mean American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score was 96.89. In the DCIA group, 1 patient (8.3%) had a hernia and the mean Harris Hip score was 98.33.

Conclusion: Given that these 2 options present donor-site concerns, the authors consider the fibula free flap the first choice for maxillofacial reconstruction in most cases and the DCIA free flap a reliable complementary flap in selected patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.03.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dcia group
20
fibula group
12
group
9
donor-site morbidity
8
morbidity free
8
free fibula
8
dcia
8
subjective evaluation
8
evaluation included
8
objective evaluation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!