Background: Robotic rectal cancer resection remains controversial. We compared the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic vs robotic rectal cancer resection in a high-risk Veterans Health Administration population.
Methods: Patients who underwent minimally invasive rectal cancer resection were identified from an institutional colorectal cancer database. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between robotic and laparoscopic groups.
Results: The robotic group (n = 13) did not differ significantly from the laparoscopic group (n = 59) with respect to baseline characteristics except for a higher rate of previous abdominal surgery. Robotic patients had significantly lower tumors, more advanced disease, a higher rate of preoperative chemoradiation, and were more likely to undergo abdominoperineal resection. Robotic rectal resection was associated with longer operative time. There were no differences in blood loss, conversion rates, postoperative morbidity, lymph nodes harvested, margin positivity, or specimen quality between groups.
Conclusions: The robotic approach for rectal cancer resection is safe with similar postoperative and oncologic outcomes compared with laparoscopy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.036 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
A novel MRI-based radiomics for preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer.
Abdom Radiol (NY)
January 2025
Department of Radiology, Taizhou Municipal Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Background: To develop and validate a clinical-radiomics model for preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in rectal cancer.
Methods: This retrospective study included data from 239 patients with pathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma from two centers, all of whom underwent MRI examinations. Cases from the first center (n = 189) were randomly divided into a training set and an internal validation set at a 7:3 ratio, while cases from the second center (n = 50) constituted the external validation set.
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery reflecting current practices.
Surg Today
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University Hospital, 3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa-Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan.
Purpose: In recent years, major advancements have been made in rectal cancer surgery with the introduction of new techniques such as robotic surgery and indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI). This study aimed to evaluate the comprehensive risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) following rectal cancer surgery, incorporating recently introduced techniques and other existing factors, to reflect current practices.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 304 patients who underwent either robotic or laparoscopic anterior resection between January 2019 and December 2023.
Long-Term Effects of Ozone Treatment in Patients with Persistent Numbness and Tingling Secondary to Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. A Retrospective Study.
Integr Cancer Ther
January 2025
University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Background: Numbness and tingling secondary to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) are frequent side effects that limit chemotherapy treatment and quality of life. Successful treatments for CIPN are limited. This preliminary report shows the potential long-term effects of ozone treatment in the management of persistent numbness and tingling secondary to CIPN.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLocal excision for T1 rectal cancer: A population-based study of practice patterns and oncological outcomes.
Colorectal Dis
January 2025
Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Aim: Local excision (LE) for T1 rectal cancer may be recommended in those with low-risk disease, while resection is typically recommended in those with a high risk of luminal recurrence or lymph node metastasis. The aim of this work was to compare survival between resection and LE.
Method: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study set in the Canadian province of Ontario.
Surgical Emergencies in Rectal Cancer: A Narrative Review.
J Clin Med
December 2024
General Surgery Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most diagnosed cancer worldwide and the second most common cause of cancer death. About 20% of patients diagnosed with rectal cancer present with emergency symptoms. Typical symptoms include acute bleeding, obstruction, and perforation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!