Purpose: In this clinical trial we evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a novel pressure attenuation device for the reduction or elimination of female stress urinary incontinence using a prospective, randomized, single-blind, multicenter design.
Materials And Methods: A total of 166 female patients with stress urinary incontinence were randomized 2:1 to treatment with an intravesical pressure attenuation device (112) or sham procedure (54). In the treatment arm the device was replaced every 90 days and in the sham arm device replacement was simulated every 90 days. The primary outcome measure was Stamey score improvement of 1 or more at 6 months. An additional outcome measure evaluated at 6 months was a composite score combining data from a provocative pad test and patient impression of symptom improvement.
Results: In the treatment arm 40.9% of women achieved the primary end point, compared to only 22.4% in the sham arm (p=0.046 in per protocol analysis). In an intent to treat analysis, 28.6% of women in the treatment arm reached the primary end point vs 22.2% of women in the sham arm (p=0.455). 50.8% of women in the treatment arm reached the composite end point compared to 16.3% of women in the control arm (p<0.001, intent to treat analysis). Three-day voiding diaries revealed a mean reduction in total daily leakage events after 6 months from 4.4 per day to 2.5 per day (43.2%) in the treatment group vs 5.4 per day to 4.1 per day (24.1% reduction) in the control group (p<0.001).
Conclusions: Minimally invasive treatment for female stress urinary incontinence with a first-generation intravesical pressure attenuation device was safe and effective when evaluated by a composite end point. For those patients that can tolerate the device, the concept of pressure attenuation as a therapy for stress urinary incontinence is valid and feasible. Further modifications are anticipated for this device potentially resulting in improved outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.042 | DOI Listing |
Addict Sci Clin Pract
January 2025
Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington/Harborview Medical Center, 325 9Th Avenue, Box 359780, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Background: Initiation of buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) in acute care settings improves access and outcomes, however patients who use methamphetamine are less likely to link to ongoing treatment. We describe the intervention and design from a pilot randomized controlled trial of an intervention to increase linkage to and retention in outpatient buprenorphine services for patients with OUD and methamphetamine use who initiate buprenorphine in the hospital.
Methods: The study is a two-arm pilot randomized controlled trial (N = 40) comparing the mHealth Incentivized Adherence Plus Patient Navigation (MIAPP) intervention to treatment as usual.
Trials
January 2025
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, 08544, NJ, USA.
Background: Phase-3 clinical trials provide the highest level of evidence on drug safety and effectiveness needed for market approval by implementing large randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, 30-40% of these trials fail mainly because such studies have inadequate sample sizes, stemming from the inability to obtain accurate initial estimates of average treatment effect parameters.
Methods: To remove this obstacle from the drug development cycle, we present a new algorithm called Trend-Adaptive Design with a Synthetic-Intervention-Based Estimator (TAD-SIE) that powers a parallel-group trial, a standard RCT design, by leveraging a state-of-the-art hypothesis testing strategy and a novel trend-adaptive design (TAD).
Radiat Oncol
January 2025
ISTCT UMR 6030-CNRS, Université de Caen-Normandie, Caen, France.
Background: Radiotherapy as a complement or an alternative to neurosurgery has a central role in the treatment of skull base grade I-II meningiomas. Radiotherapy techniques have improved considerably over the last two decades, becoming more effective and sparing more and more the healthy tissue surrounding the tumour. Currently, hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for small tumours and normo-fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or proton-therapy (PT) for larger tumours are the most widely used techniques.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTrials
January 2025
London Centre for Primary Care, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Background: The aim of the SURECAN trial is to evaluate a person-centred intervention, based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT Plus ( +)), for people who have completed treatment for cancer with curative intent, but are experiencing poor quality of life. We present the statistical analysis plan for assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the intervention in improving quality of life 1 year post randomisation.
Methods And Design: SURECAN is a multi-centre, pragmatic, two-arm, partially clustered randomised controlled superiority trial comparing the effectiveness of ACT + added to usual care with usual aftercare.
Ann Chir Plast Esthet
January 2025
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea.
Background: Unicortical plate fixation offers several theoretical advantages in the treatment of metacarpal shaft fractures compared to bicortical fixation. This approach avoids the potential hazard of excessive drilling into the volar cortex, thus minimizing damage to surrounding soft tissues and helping prevent complications related to improperly sized screws. These benefits prompted our team to conduct a preliminary clinical study to investigate the effectiveness and safety of this approach.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!