Objectives: To characterize the use of emergent JJ ureteric stent placement and percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) for patients with obstructive urolithiasis with sepsis, and to determine whether outcomes differ between the two treatment methods.

Patients And Methods: A total of 130 patients with obstructive urolithiasis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria were identified retrospectively from a single health system database from 1995 to 2011. Primary outcomes included stone-related and clinical variables which predicted the use of each treatment method. Secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay, risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and surgical approach used for definitive stone management.

Results: The overall rate of failed procedures was 2.3% (3/130), with one in-hospital death (0.8%). Patients treated with PCN had larger stones (10 vs 7 mm, P = 0.031), and were more acutely ill (acute physiology, age, chronic health evaluation [APACHE] II scores of 15 vs 11, P = 0.036) than those treated with JJ stent placement. Patients treated with PCN were more likely to require ICU admission (odds ratio: 3.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24-8.41, P = 0.016), and demonstrated longer length of hospital stay (β: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.20-0.74, P = 0.001), even when adjusting for age, APACHE II score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. After resolution of sepsis, patients treated with PCN were more likely to be treated definitively with a percutaneous approach, while patients treated with JJ stent placement were more likely to be treated ureteroscopically.

Conclusions: Both JJ stent placement and PCN drainage appear effective. Patients with larger stones and who are more acutely ill are more likely to be treated with PCN. Additional randomized clinical trials of adequate power are warranted to define the optimum management of these often complex cases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.12161DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stent placement
16
patients treated
16
treated pcn
16
obstructive urolithiasis
12
emergent ureteric
8
ureteric stent
8
percutaneous nephrostomy
8
urolithiasis sepsis
8
patients obstructive
8
outcomes included
8

Similar Publications

Background: Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) may provoke hypertension and/or impaired kidney function. Some patients develop uncontrolled hypertension and deteriorating kidney function despite optimal medical therapy. In these patients, endovascular treatment is an important therapeutic option.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Concurrent malignant biliary and gastric outlet obstruction requires urgent palliative intervention to improve patient quality of life and permit systemic therapy. Traditional management has been surgical gastrojejunostomy and hepaticojejunostomy, two morbid procedures. Comparatively, endoscopic stenting can relieve both sites of obstruction with less complications and quicker recovery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A 50-year-old female presented with a 10-day history of progressive swelling and pain in the left lower extremity, ultimately diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and May-Thurner Syndrome (MTS). Initial ultrasound indicated thrombosis involving the left external iliac, femoral, and popliteal veins, among others. Blood tests revealed normocytic anemia, but thrombophilia screening and other blood markers were normal.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Suspicion of vascular injury during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) should be raised in the event of intraprocedural bleeding, persistent hyperbilirubinemia, and sepsis despite biliary stenting. Most inadvertent portal vein (PV) cannulations during ERCP are innocuous, and mere withdrawal of guidewire and catheter suffices. However, unintentional PV stenting, particularly with larger metallic stents, increases the likelihood of significant bleeding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To assess whether safety profile and treatment success of percutaneous biodegradable biliary stent placement are competitive with traditional treatment options for treatment of benign biliary strictures.

Materials And Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were systematically reviewed for articles reporting percutaneous biodegradable stent placement for treating benign biliary strictures. Databases were searched for articles until December 2023, with the earliest included article dating from April 2016.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!