A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A novel electrocardiographic predictor of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. | LitMetric

Aims: A wide QRS with left bundle branch block pattern is usually required for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. However, ∼30% of patients do not benefit from CRT. We evaluated whether a detailed analysis of QRS complex can improve prediction of CRT success.

Methods And Results: We studied 51 patients (67.3 + 9.5 years, 36 males) with classical indication to CRT. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) (50 mm/s, 0.05 mV/mm) was obtained before and 3 months after CRT. The following ECG intervals were measured in leads V1 and V6: (i) total QRS duration; (ii) QRS onset-R wave peak; (iii) R wave peak-S wave peak (RS-V1 and RS-V6); (iv) S wave peak-QRS end; and (v) difference between QR in V6 and in V1. Patients were considered as responder when left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased by ≥5% and New York Heart Association class by ≥1 after 3 months of CRT. Of ECG intervals, only basal RS-V1 was longer in responders (n = 36) compared with non-responders (52.9 ± 11.8 vs. 44.0 ± 12.6 ms, P = 0.021). Among patients with RS-V1 ≥45 ms 83% responded to CRT vs. 33% of those with RS-V1 < 45 ms (P < 0.001). RS-V1 ≥ 45 ms was independently associated with response to CRT in multivariable analysis (odds ratio 9.8; P = 0.002). A reduction of RS-V1 ≥ 10 ms by CRT also significantly predicted clinical response. RS-V1 shortening correlated with improvement in LVEF (r = -0.45; P < 0.001) and in MS (r = 0.46; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our data point out that RS-V1 interval and its changes with CRT may help to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from CRT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eut151DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

crt
11
clinical response
8
cardiac resynchronization
8
resynchronization therapy
8
patients benefit
8
benefit crt
8
months crt
8
crt ecg
8
ecg intervals
8
wave peak
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!