A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Safety of capsule endoscopy in the octogenarian as compared with younger patients. | LitMetric

Safety of capsule endoscopy in the octogenarian as compared with younger patients.

Gastrointest Endosc

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road South, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

Published: November 2013

Background: There has been an increased use of capsule endoscopy for the evaluation of small-intestine pathology in very elderly patients, yet the safety profile of this procedure has not been well-established.

Objective: To estimate the adverse event rate of capsule endoscopy in patients aged ≥80 years and to compare this rate with that of capsule endoscopy patients aged <80 years.

Design: Retrospective matched cohort study.

Setting: Single tertiary-care referral center.

Patients: All 195 patients aged ≥80 years who underwent capsule endoscopy between 2005 and 2011 were included, along with 585 capsule endoscopy patients aged <80 years who were matched by sex in a 1:3 fashion.

Intervention: All patients underwent capsule endoscopy and, in selected cases, double-balloon enteroscopy.

Main Outcome Measurements: Adverse event rate of capsule endoscopy, which was defined as capsule retention or aspiration.

Results: Adverse events occurred at a similar frequency in patients aged ≥80 years compared with those aged <80 years (1.03% vs 0.85%; P = 1.00), resulting in a difference of 0.2% (95% confidence interval, -1.8% to 2.1%). All adverse events were related to capsule retention, with no study patients experiencing aspiration.

Limitations: This was a single-center, retrospective study.

Conclusion: Adverse events resulting from capsule endoscopy occur at a similar rate in patients aged ≥80 years compared with those aged <80 years. Capsule endoscopy can be performed safely in the very elderly patient population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.05.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

capsule endoscopy
16
rate capsule
8
endoscopy patients
8
patients aged
8
safety capsule
4
endoscopy
4
endoscopy octogenarian
4
octogenarian compared
4
compared younger
4
patients
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!