AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the impact of the MMR booster vaccine on disease activity and immunogenicity in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) receiving immunocompromising treatments.
  • 137 patients aged 4 to 9 years participated in a randomized trial, receiving either the MMR booster or no vaccination, with disease activity measured through a score ranging from 0 to 57.
  • Results showed no significant difference in disease activity between the vaccinated group and controls, but seroprotection rates were notably higher at 12 months for those who received the vaccine.

Article Abstract

Importance: The immunogenicity and the effects of live attenuated measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination on disease activity in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are matters of concern, especially in patients treated with immunocompromising therapies.

Objectives: To assess whether MMR booster vaccination affects disease activity and to describe MMR booster immunogenicity in patients with JIA.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Randomized, multicenter, open-label clinical equivalence trial including 137 patients with JIA aged 4 to 9 years who were recruited from 5 academic hospitals in The Netherlands between May 2008 and July 2011.

Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to receive MMR booster vaccination (n=68) or no vaccination (control group; n=69). Among patients taking biologics, these treatments were discontinued at 5 times their half-lives prior to vaccination.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Disease activity as measured by the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS-27), ranging from 0 (no activity) to 57 (high activity). Disease activity in the year following randomization was compared between revaccinated patients and controls using a linear mixed model. A difference in JADAS-27 of 2.0 was the equivalence margin. Primary immunogenicity outcomes were seroprotection rates and MMR-specific antibody concentrations at 3 and 12 months.

Results: Of 137 randomized patients, 131 were analyzed in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, including 60 using methotrexate and 15 using biologics. Disease activity during complete follow-up did not differ between 63 revaccinated patients (JADAS-27, 2.8; 95% CI, 2.1-3.5) and 68 controls (JADAS-27, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.7-3.1), with a difference of 0.4 (95% CI, -0.5 to 1.2), within the equivalence margin of 2.0. At 12 months, seroprotection rates were higher in revaccinated patients vs controls (measles, 100% vs 92% [95% CI, 84%-99%]; mumps, 97% [95% CI, 95%-100%] vs 81% [95% CI, 72%-93%]; and rubella, 100% vs 94% [95% CI, 86%-100%], respectively), as were antibody concentrations against measles (1.63 vs 0.78 IU/mL; P = .03), mumps (168 vs 104 RU/mL; P = .03), and rubella (69 vs 45 IU/mL; P = .01). Methotrexate and biologics did not affect humoral responses, but low patient numbers precluded definite conclusions.

Conclusion And Relevance: Among children with JIA who had undergone primary immunization, MMR booster vaccination compared with no booster did not result in worse JIA disease activity and was immunogenic. Larger studies are needed to assess MMR effects in patients using biologic agents.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00731965.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.6768DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

disease activity
32
booster vaccination
16
mmr booster
16
vaccination disease
12
patients
12
revaccinated patients
12
activity
10
effects live
8
live attenuated
8
attenuated measles-mumps-rubella
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!