Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
When assessing the fitness levels of athletes, body composition is usually estimated, as it may play a role in athletic performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the validity of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and skinfold (SKF) methods compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for estimating percent body fat (%BF) in Division 1 collegiate baseball players (n = 35). The results of this study indicate that the field methods investigated were not valid compared with DXA for estimating %BF. In conclusion, this study does not support the use of the TBF-350, HBF-306, HBF-500, or SKF thickness for estimating %BF in collegiate baseball players. The reliability of these BIA devices remains unknown; therefore, it is currently uncertain if they may be used to track changes over time.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15438627.2013.792087 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!