Practice patterns among U.S. gastroenterologists regarding endoscopic management of Barrett's esophagus.

Gastrointest Endosc

Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansas City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA; Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

Published: November 2013

AI Article Synopsis

  • A study was conducted to evaluate how gastroenterologists manage Barrett's esophagus (BE) through a survey sent to various practitioners across the U.S.
  • The survey, which had a 45% response rate, revealed that most respondents were experienced gastroenterologists working in community settings, with many not using established classification systems like the Prague C & M.
  • Findings indicated varied approaches to treatment: 86% monitored nondysplastic BE with surveillance, while treatment strategies for high-grade dysplasia included referrals to specialized centers and endoscopic ablation practices.

Article Abstract

Background: Endoscopic management of Barrett's esophagus (BE) has evolved over the past decade; however, the practice patterns for managing BE among gastroenterologists remain unclear.

Objective: To assess practice patterns for management of BE among gastroenterologists working in various practice settings.

Design: A random questionnaire-based survey of practicing gastroenterologists in the United States. The questionnaire contained a total of 10 questions pertaining to practice setting, physician demographics, and strategies used for managing BE.

Setting: Survey of gastroenterologists working in various practice settings.

Intervention: Questionnaire.

Main Outcome Measurements: Practice patterns for endoscopic imaging and management of BE.

Results: The response rate was 45% (236/530). The majority (85%) were gastroenterologists in community practice, 72% were aged 41 to 60 years, 80% had >10 years of experience, and 81% had attended postgraduate courses and/or seminars on BE management. A total of 78% did not use the Prague C & M classification, and about a third used advanced endoscopic imaging routinely (37%) or in selected cases (31%). For nondysplastic BE, 86% practiced surveillance, 12% performed ablation, and 3% did no intervention. For BE with low-grade dysplasia, 56% practiced surveillance, 26% performed endoscopic ablation in all low-grade dysplasia cases, and 18% performed endoscopic ablation in only selected patients with low-grade dysplasia. The majority of respondents (58%) referred their patients with high-grade dysplasia to centers with BE expertise, 13% performed endoscopic ablation in all patients with high-grade dysplasia, 25% performed endoscopic ablation in selected cases only, and 3% referred these patients for surgery. The most frequently used endoscopic eradication therapy was radiofrequency ablation (39%) followed by EMR (17%).

Limitations: The sample may be unrepresentative, participation in the study was voluntary, and responses may be skewed toward following the guidelines.

Conclusion: Results from this survey show that the majority of practicing gastroenterologists in the United States practice surveillance endoscopy in patients with nondysplastic BE and provide endoscopic therapy for those with high-grade dysplasia. The Prague C & M classification and advanced imaging techniques are used by less than a third of gastroenterologists. Practice patterns did not appear to be affected by respondent age or duration of clinical practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.05.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

practice patterns
20
performed endoscopic
16
endoscopic ablation
16
low-grade dysplasia
12
high-grade dysplasia
12
practice
11
endoscopic
10
gastroenterologists
8
endoscopic management
8
management barrett's
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!