Purpose: To provide a summary of the impact on vision of an aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) compared with a spherical IOL in cataract surgery.
Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis.
Participants: Patients from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cataract surgery with aspheric compared with spherical monofocal IOL implantation.
Methods: We systematically searched the peer-reviewed literature in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, BIOSIS, and the Cochrane Library according to the Cochrane Collaboration method to identify relevant RCTs. The inclusion criteria were RCTs on cataract surgery comparing the use of aspheric versus spherical IOL implantation that assessed visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, or quality of vision. The effects were calculated as mean differences or standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) and pooled using random-effect models.
Main Outcome Measures: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity, and subjective perception of the quality of vision.
Results: Forty-three studies provided data and were included, comprising 2076 eyes implanted with aspheric IOLs and 2034 eyes implanted with spherical IOLs. The BCVA showed a significant difference for aspheric IOLs (-0.01 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.02 to -0.00). For contrast sensitivity, a significant advantage for aspheric IOLs was found under photopic and mesopic light conditions (photopic: Hedges' g 0.42, 95% CI 0.24-0.61 (3 cycles per degree [cpd]) to 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.73 (12 cpd); mesopic: Hedges' g 0.49, 95% CI 0.23-0.75 (1.5 cpd) to 0.76, 95% CI 0.52-1.00 (18 cpd)). Questionnaires targeting the subjective perception of quality of vision yielded less conclusive results.
Conclusions: Overall, a patient may achieve better contrast sensitivity with an aspheric IOL than with a spherical IOL, especially under dim light. There was no clinically relevant difference in BCVA between aspheric and spherical IOL implantation. The findings on the subjective perception of visual quality were heterogeneous with no clear result favoring either option.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.04.011 | DOI Listing |
Life (Basel)
January 2025
Centro Oftalmológico Charles, Buenos Aiers C1116, Argentina.
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of a new hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens called Clareon (Alcon) using the mini-monovision technique.
Methods: A single-center, prospective, nonrandomized study was conducted in Tandil (Buenos Aires, Argentina), including patients scheduled for cataract surgery. To achieve mini-monovision, the spherical equivalent was calculated between -0.
J Cataract Refract Surg
January 2025
Vision and Eye Research Institute, School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Purpose: To measure visual acuity at three different defocus planes in pseudophakic subjects with varying levels of spherical aberration induced by an adaptive optics visual simulator. The study aimed to simulate Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs).
Setting: Private hospital (IMO, Barcelona, Spain).
Retina
January 2025
Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200031, People's Republic of China.
Purpose: To describe a simplified technique for correcting intraocular lens (IOL) decentration during scleral-sutured IOL fixation surgery.
Methods: During surgery, Purkinje images were utilized to assess IOL positioning. A straightforward IOL decentration adjustment technique was employed when necessary.
J Ophthalmol
January 2025
Pediatric Ophthalmology, Shanxi Aier Eye Hospital, Aier Eye Hospital Group, Changsha, China.
To investigate the correlation between corneal biomechanical characteristics and refractive status in adolescents aged 5-13 years. A cross-sectional study involved 339 children aged 5-13 with a spherical equivalent (SE) range from -6.00 to +2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActa Med Philipp
December 2024
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Objective: Toric intraocular lens implantation has been used to correct corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery. The study aimed to compare the visual outcomes between manual vs markerless toric intraocular lens implantation in astigmatic correction.
Methods: The medical records of patients at American Eye Center who underwent phacoemulsification by multiple surgeons with insertion of monofocal or multifocal toric lenses via manual marking and markerless method from 2010-2019 were reviewed.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!