Although robust evidence indicates that action initiation can occur unconsciously and unintentionally, the literature on action inhibition suggests that inhibition requires both conscious thought and intentionality. In prior research demonstrating automatic inhibition in response to unconsciously processed stimuli, the unconscious stimuli had previously been consciously associated with an inhibitory response within the context of the experiment, and participants had consciously formed a goal to activate inhibition processes when presented with the stimuli (because task instructions required participants to engage in inhibition when the stimuli occurred). Therefore, prior work suggests that some amount of conscious thought and intentionality are required for inhibitory control. In the present research, we recorded event-related potentials during two go/no-go experiments in which participants were subliminally primed with general action/inaction concepts that had never been consciously associated with task-specific responses. We provide the first demonstration that inhibitory control processes can be modulated completely unconsciously and unintentionally.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5783540PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

inhibitory control
12
unconsciously unintentionally
8
conscious thought
8
thought intentionality
8
consciously associated
8
inhibition
5
complete unconscious
4
control
4
unconscious control
4
control inaction
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!