A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Endometrial carcinoma: clinical characteristic and survival rates by the new compared to the prior FIGO staging systems. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare clinical features and survival rates of endometrial cancer patients using the 1988 and 2009 FIGO staging systems.
  • Data was collected from 259 patients treated between 1992 and 2008, revealing changes in staging, with most patients categorized in lower stages under the new system.
  • While early stage survival rates declined for new stages IA and IB, other stage survivals remained similar between the two systems, indicating the need for ongoing evaluation of staging impact on treatment outcomes.

Article Abstract

Objective: To compare clinical characteristic features and survival rates of endometrial cancer (EMC) patients according to the new 2009 and prior 1988 FIGO staging systems.

Material And Method: Clinico-pathological data of EMC patients who had primary surgical treatment between 1992 and 2008 were collected. The new FIGO staging was compared to the prior assigned staging. Survivals of patients according to prior and new staging were compared

Results: Data from 259 patients was reviewed. Mean age was 55.4 +/- 9.9 years. Radiation was the most common adjuvant therapy after surgery, 95/106 patients (89.6%). Progression and recurrences occurred in 34 patients (16 with progression and 18 with recurrence) while 47 died (18.1%). Comparing the prior and current staging, early stage I-II was commonly found in both systems. Stages were the same in 81 patients (31.3%), lower in 177 (68.3%), and higher in one (0.4%). After a median follow-up of 57.5 months, 5-year progression-free, cancer-specific and overall survivals according to the prior and new systems were similar in stage III-IV. Survivals of new stage IA (from 16-prior stage IA, 124-IB, 12-IIA, and 1-IIIA) and stage IB (from 32-IC and 8-IIA) were worse than those of prior stage IA or IB. Survivals of the new stage II patients (11-IIB) were the same as prior stage IIB.

Conclusion: The "new" FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer patients resulted in lower stage in a large number of patients. Survival trends were worse in the new stage I and remained similar in the other stages.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

figo staging
16
patients
10
stage
10
clinical characteristic
8
survival rates
8
prior
8
compared prior
8
endometrial cancer
8
emc patients
8
survivals stage
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!