Paying attention to orthography: a visual evoked potential study.

Front Hum Neurosci

BRANE Lab, School of Audiology and Speech Sciences, University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Published: June 2013

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explored how adults process single letters and pseudoletters, focusing on visual networks in reading.
  • Larger N1 and P2 responses indicate that pseudoletters required more visual processing than regular letters.
  • Attention directed towards or away from orthographic features did not significantly affect the early visual processing of these letters, suggesting a sensory-based perception that operates independently of task demands.

Article Abstract

In adult readers, letters, and words are rapidly identified within visual networks to allow for efficient reading abilities. Neuroimaging studies of orthography have mostly used words and letter strings that recruit many hierarchical levels in reading. Understanding how single letters are processed could provide further insight into orthographic processing. The present study investigated orthographic processing using single letters and pseudoletters when adults were encouraged to pay attention to or away from orthographic features. We measured evoked potentials (EPs) to single letters and pseudoletters from adults while they performed an orthographic-discrimination task (letters vs. pseudoletters), a color-discrimination task (red vs. blue), and a target-detection task (respond to #1 and #2). Larger and later peaking N1 responses (~170 ms) and larger P2 responses (~250 ms) occurred to pseudoletters as compared to letters. This reflected greater visual processing for pseudoletters. Dipole analyses localized this effect to bilateral fusiform and inferior temporal cortices. Moreover, this letter-pseudoletter difference was not modulated by task and thus indicates that directing attention to or away from orthographic features did not affect early visual processing of single letters or pseudoletters within extrastriate regions. Paying attention to orthography or color as compared to disregarding the stimuli (target-detection task) elicited selection negativities at about 175 ms, which were followed by a classical N2-P3 complex. This indicated that the tasks sufficiently drew participant's attention to and away from the stimuli. Together these findings revealed that visual processing of single letters and pseudoletters, in adults, appeared to be sensory-contingent and independent of paying attention to stimulus features (e.g., orthography or color).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3659343PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00199DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

single letters
20
letters pseudoletters
20
paying attention
12
processing single
12
pseudoletters adults
12
visual processing
12
attention orthography
8
letters
8
orthographic processing
8
attention orthographic
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Generating physician letters is a time-consuming task in daily clinical practice.

Methods: This study investigates local fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs), specifically LLaMA models, for physician letter generation in a privacy-preserving manner within the field of radiation oncology.

Results: Our findings demonstrate that base LLaMA models, without fine-tuning, are inadequate for effectively generating physician letters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The full-length sequence of HLA-DQB1*06:304N covers the 5'-untranslated region (UTR), all introns and exons, and the 3' UTR.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The new allele HLA-B*44:384 differs from HLA-B*44:02:01:01 by one non-synonymous nucleotide substitution in exon 2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!