Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of autologous in-situ blood coagulum versus sutures for attaching conjunctival limbal autografts (CAG) among patients undergoing primary pterygium excision over a period of 1 year. Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients with primary pterygium were randomly divided in into two groups: group I (16 eyes) underwent CAG with 10-0 monofilament nylon sutures and group II (16 eyes) underwent CAG with patient's own in-situ blood coagulum acting as bioadhesive or fixative followed by bandaging for 48 h. Patients were followed up postoperatively on the 2nd day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 months. All the surgeries were done by the same surgeon. Graft success, recurrence rate, operating time, patient comfort, graft retraction or any other complication were studied. The duration of surgery was significantly less (P < 0.001) in group II (mean duration 15 ± 2 min) than group I (mean duration 67 ± 2 min). Postoperative symptoms were fewer for group II than group I. Rate of recurrence was equal in both groups (one patient in each group, 6.25 %). But complications regarding graft failure and graft retraction were more common in group II (two patients, 12.5 %) than group I (one patient, 6.25 %); however, the difference was not statistically significant (Z = 0.61). Thus, autologous in-situ blood coagulum is a useful method for graft fixation in pterygium surgery with shorter operating time and less postoperative discomfort.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-013-9790-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blood coagulum
12
coagulum versus
8
versus sutures
8
pterygium excision
8
in-situ blood
8
primary pterygium
8
group eyes
8
eyes underwent
8
underwent cag
8
comparison autologous
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!