Objective: To assess differences in clinical outcome of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) treatment in men and women.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: University Medical Center.

Patients: 1946 primary prevention ICD recipients (1528 (79%) men and 418 (21%) women). Patients with congenital heart disease were excluded for this analysis.

Main Outcome Measures: All-cause mortality, ICD therapy (antitachycardia pacing and shock) and ICD shock.

Results: During a median follow-up of 3.3 years (25th-75th percentile 1.4-5.4), 387 (25%) men and 76 (18%) women died. The estimated 5-year cumulative incidence for all-cause mortality was 20% (95% CI 18% to 23%) for men and 14% (95% CI 9% to 19%) for women (log rank p<0.01). After adjustment for potential confounding covariates all-cause mortality was lower in women (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.84; p<0.01). The 5-year cumulative incidence for appropriate therapy in men was 24% (95% CI 21% to 28%) as compared with 20% (95% CI 14% to 26%) in women (log rank p=0.07). After adjustment, a non-significant trend remained (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.06; p=0.13).

Conclusions: In clinical practice, 21% of primary prevention ICD recipients are women. Women have lower mortality and tend to experience less appropriate ICD therapy as compared with their male peers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

differences clinical
8
clinical outcome
8
primary prevention
8
all-cause mortality
8
gender-specific differences
4
outcome primary
4
prevention implantable
4
implantable cardioverter
4
cardioverter defibrillator
4
defibrillator recipients
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!