Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare entity of uterine cervical carcinoma. Most of them have a more aggressive course and worse prognosis than a common type squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, precise diagnosis is very crucial.
Objective: To study clinicopathological correlation and immunohistochemistry of uterine cervical NEC MATERIAL AND METHOD: All primary uterine cervical carcinomas from a 51-month period were histopathologically reviewed. Suspicious NECs were retrieved and immunohistochemically studiedfor chromogranin, synaptophysin, non-specific esterase (NSE) and CD56. Clinical information including treatments and mean disease free survival time were obtainedfrom chart review
Results: Fourteen (3.5%) cases of NEC were identified from 389primary uterine cervical carcinomas between October 1, 2002 and December 31, 2006 and classified into small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SNEC, 8 cases), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LNEC, 3 cases), mixed SNEC and adenocarcinoma (2 cases), and mixed SNEC anid squamous cell carcinoma (1 case). All NEC presented with abnormal vaginal bleeding. The median age was 44 years (34-75 years). Exophytic mass was noted in 11 patients (78.6%). Five patients (36%) had distant metastases. All cases were immunoreactive for at least two neuroendocrine markers. Nine cases (64.3%) were positive for chromogranin, 11 (78.6%) for synaptophysin, 12 (85. 7%) for NSE, and 11 (78.6%) for CD56. CD56 was positive in eight of 11 SNEC cases. The mean disease free interval and overall survival time were 17.5 and 23.9 months, respectively
Conclusion: Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix is rare and has poor prognosis. In addition to histopathology, panel ofimmunohistochemistry is mandatory in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine carcinoma. Varying results of immunohistochemistry may be found.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!