AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of extended release manipulation of the posterior knee clearance during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on joint function and range of motion compared to a standard procedure.
  • - A total of 120 patients with knee osteoarthritis were divided into an experimental group (who received extended manipulation) and a control group (who only had osteophyte cleaning), with significant differences found in extension clearance and recovery times for knee flexion post-surgery.
  • - Results indicated that while both groups had similar flexion clearance, the experimental group achieved better extension clearance and had faster recovery of knee flexion range at the 3-month follow-up, with no issues of femoral component loosening observed in either

Article Abstract

Objective: To observe the change of clearance and range of joint improved situation during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by operating extended release manipulation of the posterior knee clearance.

Methods: A total of 120 patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing unilateral TKA from March 2010 to March 2012 were equally randomized prospectively assigned to the experimental group and control group, each 60 cases. There were 46 male and 74 female patients, the mean age was 63.6 years (range from 49 to 75 years). After the osteotomy of the tibia and the femoral condyle and before the release of soft tissue intraoperation, patients in experimental group were taken the extended release manipulation of the posterior knee clearence while the control group were cleaned the osteophyte of the posterior condyle only, 2-sided paired t test was used to compare the clearence intraoperation and the time to flexion angle of 90° and 120° and the maximum angle after 3 months' follow-up.

Results: There was no significant difference of the index between the experimental group and control group (P > 0.05). Between experimental group and control group, the difference was significant in extention clearance ((18.9 ± 1.5) mm vs. (17.9 ± 1.6) mm, t = 3.53, P < 0.01) intraoperation, and no significant difference in flexion clearance ((20.7 ± 1.8) mm vs. (20.2 ± 1.9) mm, t = 1.48, P > 0.05). It took longer time for the knee flexion range of motion to 90°(t = 10.2399, P < 0.01) or 120°(t = 11.142, P < 0.01) of the control group than that of the experimental group, and the difference of the maximum range of motion between experimental group and control group was significant statistically at the 3-months follow-up (t = 4.4255, P < 0.01). All the patients were followed up for 3 - 24 months, average of 14.6 months, no femoral component loosening happened.

Conclusions: Extended release of the posterior knee clearance benefits the knee extension clearence intraoperation and functional exercise of range of motion postoperation, while it is no meaning to the flexion clearence.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

experimental group
24
control group
24
extended release
16
range motion
16
group control
16
posterior knee
12
group
12
knee
9
release posterior
8
flexion clearence
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!