A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The assessment of reliability of cognitive evoked potential in normal person. | LitMetric

The assessment of reliability of cognitive evoked potential in normal person.

Ann Rehabil Med

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuromuscular Disease, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Published: April 2013

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the reliability of P300 latency and amplitude in event-related potentials (ERPs) among 30 healthy adults, with a particular focus on the P300 component, which reflects cognitive processing.
  • The results revealed that P300 latency had an excellent reliability score (ICC of 0.81), while the amplitude had a more moderate reliability (ICC of 0.53), with the average latency being 311.3 ms.
  • The findings suggest that P300 latency is a more reliable measure than amplitude and, with further research, could serve as a useful indicator for evaluating cognitive states and predicting outcomes.

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate intra-tester reliability of P300 more precisely, this study was designed. Event-related potential (ERP) is the result of endogenous brain response following cognitive stimulus. The P300 component of the human ERP is a positive wave with a latency of 300 ms or greater. Our purpose of this study was to estimate reliability of P300 latency and amplitude with 30 normal persons without head injury, as well as to set up them as the reference values in the event that they would be found to be highly reliable.

Methods: ERP was performed at three separate times on 30 normal adults in their 20s and 30s. We measured P300 latency and amplitude among ERP.

Results: P300 latency show excellent reliability with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.81. As to P300 amplitude, reliability was good to fair with ICC of 0.53. Average value of P300 latency was 311.3±37.0 ms, shorter than reference value of previous study in Korea.

Conclusion: P300 latency revealed higher reliability than P300 amplitude, although reliability of P300 was confirmed in both component. After further study including precise mechanism, influence factor on measurement and method standardization, it is expected to be an objective indicator to assess the cognitive state and predict prognosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3660489PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2013.37.2.263DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

p300 latency
20
reliability p300
16
p300
10
latency amplitude
8
p300 amplitude
8
amplitude reliability
8
reliability
6
latency
6
assessment reliability
4
reliability cognitive
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!