AI Article Synopsis

  • * Most procedures were elective, with a slight increase in urgent cases over time; patients had an average age of 76 years, and the overall 30-day mortality rate was low at 1.2%.
  • * Post-surgery, 30% of patients experienced endoleaks, which contributed to higher aneurysm-related mortality and reintervention rates; however, the occurrence of major adverse events decreased significantly in later years of the study.

Article Abstract

Objective: To assess outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in an integrated health care system.

Methods: Between 2000 and 2010, 1736 patients underwent EVAR at 17 centers. Demographic data, comorbidities, and outcomes of interest were collected. EVAR in patients presenting with ruptured or symptomatic aneurysms was categorized as urgent; otherwise, it was considered elective. Primary outcomes were mortality and aneurysm-related mortality (ARM). Secondary outcomes were change in aneurysm sac size, endoleak status, major adverse events, and reintervention.

Results: Overall, the median age was 76 years (interquartile range, 70-81 years), 86% were male, and 82% were Caucasian. Most cases (93.8%) were elective, but urgent use of EVAR increased from 4% in the first 5 years to 7.3% in the last 5 years of the study period. Mean aneurysm size was 5.8 cm. Patients were followed for an average of 3 years (range, 1-11 years); 8% were lost to follow-up. Intraoperatively, 4.5% of patients required adjunctive maneuvers for endoleak, fixation, or flow-limiting issues. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.2%, and the perioperative morbidity rate was 6.6%. Intraoperative type I and II endoleaks were uncommon (2.3% and 9.3%, respectively). Life-table analysis at 5 years demonstrated excellent overall survival (66%) and freedom from ARM (97%). Postoperative endoleak was seen in 30% of patients and was associated with an increase in sac size over time. Finally, the total reintervention rate was 15%, including 91 instances (5%) of revisional EVAR. The overall major adverse event rate was 7.9% and decreased significantly from 12.3% in the first 5 years to 5.6% in the second 5 years of the study period (P < .001). Overall ARM was worse in patients with postoperative endoleak (4.1% vs 1.8%; P < .01) or in those who underwent reintervention (7.6% vs 1.6%; P < .001).

Conclusions: Results from a contemporary EVAR registry in an integrated health care system demonstrate favorable perioperative outcomes and excellent clinical efficacy. However, postoperative endoleak and the need for reintervention continue to be challenging problems for patients after EVAR.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3930460PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.01.051DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

postoperative endoleak
12
years
9
endovascular abdominal
8
abdominal aortic
8
aortic aneurysm
8
aneurysm repair
8
integrated health
8
health care
8
sac size
8
major adverse
8

Similar Publications

Rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) due to an isolated type II endoleak (TIIEL) is rarely reported, accounting for less than 1% of all TIIELs; typically, rupture associated with TIIEL is accompanied by type I or type III endoleaks. We report a case of ruptured AAA secondary to TIIEL without any other types of endoleaks, occurring late after endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR). A 77-year-old man with a history of EVAR 11 years earlier presented with abdominal pain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Effect of Fiber Optic RealShape (FORS) Technology on Peri- and Post-Operative Outcomes following Complex Abdominal Aortic Repair.

J Vasc Surg

December 2024

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Electronic address:

Introduction: Ongoing innovations in the minimally invasive management of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAA), including physician-modified endografts (PMEG) and, more recently, Fiber Optic RealShape (FORS) technology, have allowed vascular surgeons to expand surgical indications and complexity of care to this multifaceted patient population. Prior analyses have demonstrated intraoperative advantages of FORS in the management of cAAA for lower total procedural radiation and cannulation tasks, however, few analyses have evaluated the technology's effect on peri- and post-operative outcomes.

Methods: All PMEGs performed at our institution between 2020-2024 were retrospectively reviewed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of balloon occlusion and intra-sac thrombin injection in the endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Methods: From October 2019 to October 2022, the clinical data of 16 patients with rAAA treated with balloon occlusion technique and intra-sac thrombin injection combined with EVAR were retrospectively analyzed, including 13 males and 3 females, aged 42-85 years, with a median age of 70.5 years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We report a rare case of rupture without bleeding secondary to endotension after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair. An 82-year-old woman had undergone multiple thoracic endovascular aortic repairs for a distal arch aneurysm. Due to the aneurysm enlargement, stent graft was eventually placed from the ascending aorta to just above the celiac artery after axillo-axillo-common carotid artery bypass.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To demonstrate successful treatment of a patient with aneurysmal lesions of several aortic segments.

Material And Methods: A patient with myelodysplastic syndrome and pancytopenia underwent endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Aneurysm of common iliac artery and borderline thoracic aortic aneurysm occurred 2 years after surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!