The Abdominal Pressure Twin Sensors (APTS) for Q3 and Q6 dummies are composed of soft polyurethane bladders filled with fluid and equipped with pressure sensors. Implanted within the abdominal insert of child dummies, they can be used to detect abdominal loading due to the belt during frontal collisions. In the present study - which is part of the EC funded CASPER project - two versions of APTS (V1 and V2) were evaluated in abdominal belt compression tests, torso flexion test (V1 only) and two series of sled tests with degraded restraint conditions. The results suggest that the two versions have similar responses, and that the pressure sensitivity to torso flexion is limited. The APTS ability to detect abdominal loading in sled tests was also confirmed, with peak pressures typically below 1 bar when the belt loaded only the pelvis and the thorax (appropriate restraint) and values above that level when the abdomen was loaded directly (inappropriate restraint). Then, accident reconstructions performed as part of CASPER and previous EC funded projects were reanalyzed. Selected data from 19 dummies (12 Q6 and 7 Q3) were used to plot injury risk curves. Maximum pressure, maximum pressure rate and their product were all found to be injury predictors. Maximum pressure levels for a 50% risk of AIS3+ were consistent with the levels separating appropriate and inappropriate restraint in the sled tests (e.g. 50% risk of AIS3+ at 1.09 bar for pressure filtered CFC180). Further work is needed to refine the scaling techniques between ages and confirm the risk curves.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2012-22-0010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sled tests
12
maximum pressure
12
pressure
8
pressure sensors
8
accident reconstructions
8
detect abdominal
8
abdominal loading
8
torso flexion
8
inappropriate restraint
8
risk curves
8

Similar Publications

From the evolutionary perspective, maintaining a committed relationship is beneficial for reproductive success but involves risks such as losing a partner or infidelity. People typically prefer partners with similar mate value (MV) to avoid rejection. However, when a mate value discrepancy (MVD) arises, the partner with lower MV might employ mate retention strategies to maintain the relationship.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: We tested the differences in maximum strength and various parameters of sprint performance between youth backs and forwards. Additionally, we examined the associations among various strength-sprint measures, as well as between unresisted and heavy resisted sprints.

Methods: Thirty-two youth rugby players were assessed at the beginning of the season with the following tests: unresisted and resisted (50% body mass) 30-m sprints and 1-repetition maximum (1RM) in the squat exercise.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates injury risk differences between females and males in vehicle crashes by examining how well male data can be scaled to predict female responses during frontal impact sled tests.
  • It utilized sled test data from four mid-size males and three mid-size females in a reclined position, applying various scaling methods to analyze how different physical dimensions influence response predictions.
  • Results showed that while scaling improved prediction accuracy for certain measures, it also indicated that physical differences alone may not fully account for the variations in responses between males and females, with torso volume being the most effective predictor.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The aim of this study was to analyze the differences in terms of (1) muscle activation patterns; (2) metabolic power (MP) and energy cost (EC) estimated via two determination methods (i.e., the Global Positioning System [GPS] and electromyography-based [EMG]); and (3) the apparent efficiency (AE) of 30-m linear sprints in seventeen elite U17 male soccer players performed under different conditions (i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study examines how varying the initial belt gap on belt-positioning boosters affects the safety of child anthropomorphic test devices during vehicle impacts, specifically focusing on potential shoulder belt slip-off and its implications during evasive maneuvers.
  • Using sled tests with different booster types and sizes, researchers measured the kinematic (movement) and kinetic (forces) outcomes of child test dummies under different belt fit conditions.
  • Results indicated that larger-gap boosters resulted in increased torso rotation and lumbar moments compared to smaller-gap boosters, suggesting that inadequate initial contact between the shoulder belt and torso may compromise safety during collisions, although no complete belt slip-offs occurred.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!