AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Introduction: Several methods of transverse patellar fixation have been described. This study compares the clinical outcome and the occurrence of complications of various fixation methods.

Sources Of Data: The databases PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Google were searched.

Areas Of Agreement: A direct comparison between fixation techniques using mixed or non-metallic implants and metallic K-wire and tension band fixation shows no significant difference in clinical outcome between both groups. Additionally, studies reporting novel operation techniques show good clinical results.

Areas Of Controversy: Studies describing the treatment of patients using non-metallic or mixed implants are fewer compared with those using metallic fixation.

Growing Points: A large variety of clinical scoring systems were used for assessing the results of treatment, which makes direct comparison difficult.

Areas Timely For Developing Research: More data of fracture treatment using non-metallic or mixed implants is needed to achieve a more balanced comparison.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldt013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

transverse patellar
8
non-metallic implants
8
clinical outcome
8
direct comparison
8
non-metallic mixed
8
mixed implants
8
treatment
4
treatment transverse
4
patellar fractures
4
comparison
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!