A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

How psychiatrists should introduce themselves in the first consultation: an experimental study. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • How psychiatrists introduce themselves can significantly affect the therapeutic relationship with patients.
  • An experiment tested patients' preferences for different styles of introductions by psychiatrists, including stating their name, profession, and outlining the consultation process.
  • Results showed that patients preferred introductions that included details about what to expect during the consultation, while personal disclosures by psychiatrists were less well-received.
  • The study suggests that psychiatrists should focus on providing clear consultation information rather than sharing personal issues.

Article Abstract

Background: How psychiatrists introduce themselves in the first consultation may influence the therapeutic relationship. There is no evidence about what type of introduction patients prefer.

Aims: To assess experimentally patients' preferences for how psychiatrists introduce themselves.

Method: Twelve psychiatrists were filmed, each with three different introductions: stating name, profession and reason for consultation; the same, plus information on what will happen during the consultation; and the same, plus disclosure of a personal difficulty. Six randomly selected videos, of different psychiatrists, two of each type of introduction, were rated by each of 120 psychiatric in- and out-patients on Likert-type scales.

Results: Patients gave the most positive ratings to psychiatrists who introduced themselves with information about what will happen in the consultation rather than ones with briefer introductions or with additional personal disclosure (P = 0.002). Preferences were similar in different subgroups.

Conclusions: Psychiatrists should introduce themselves with information about what they intend to do in the consultation, but without personal disclosure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.112.123877DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

psychiatrists introduce
16
introduce consultation
8
type introduction
8
will happen
8
happen consultation
8
personal disclosure
8
psychiatrists
7
consultation
6
consultation experimental
4
experimental study
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!