Newsome et al. question neither our key result, that large-penalty cues elicited stronger responses than small-penalty cues, nor our key conclusion, that neurons early in the trial signaled cue salience and not action value. Instead, they focus on subsequent neuronal activity. The patterns of delay-period activity that they note can be explained by reference to experimental methodology.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1233367 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!