Prospective outcome assessment of occupational rhinitis after removal from exposure.

J Occup Environ Med

Department of Surgery/Otolaryngology, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Published: May 2013

Objective: To conduct a prospective evaluation of clinical and quality of life (QOL) outcomes of occupational rhinitis (OR) after cessation of exposure.

Methods: We assessed changes in nasal symptoms, disease-specific QOL, nasal patency, and nasal inflammation in 20 subjects with confirmed OR. Olfactory function was assessed cross-sectionally at follow-up.

Results: At follow-up, a significant decrease in the number of nasal symptoms and a significant improvement in QOL were observed. There were no significant differences in nasal patency outcomes. A not significant decrease in neutrophils number in nasal fluid and a significant decrease in macrophages were observed. As a group, study subjects showed a mild olfactory dysfunction at follow-up.

Conclusions: We showed that cessation of exposure to causal agent improved QOL in patients with OR, leading to relief of rhinitis-associated symptoms and improvement in well-being.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318289ee17DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

occupational rhinitis
8
nasal symptoms
8
nasal patency
8
number nasal
8
symptoms improvement
8
nasal
6
prospective outcome
4
outcome assessment
4
assessment occupational
4
rhinitis removal
4

Similar Publications

Background: Patient education is an important part of the management of atopic diseases such as allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and asthma. Given the increasing reliance on social media platforms such as Facebook for health-related discourse, there are concerns about the accuracy and quality of the shared information.

Aim: The aim of this study was to categorize and assess the quality of the information shared within the largest Danish Facebook group focusing on atopic diseases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Allergic rhinitis is the specific inflammation against allergen by immune defense cells on the nasal mucosa, which can lead to chronic nasal symptoms such as sneezing, itching, runny nose, and nasal congestion. It is associated with high morbidity including sinusitis, asthma, otitis media, hypertrophied inferior turbinate, and nasal polyps. Despite its complications, it remains poorly recognized and tracked.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Since its inception in 1980, the MOHL index (% patients who are male, have occupational, hand, or leg dermatitis, respectively) and its later evolutions until the presently used MOAHLFA(P) index (adding % patients with atopic dermatitis, face dermatitis, age 40+ years and positive reaction(s) to ≥ 1 baseline series allergen) have been intended to convey important demographic and clinical information on the patients patch tested in a certain area and time, aiding the interpretation of the observed spectrum of sensitisation.

Objectives: To examine the current usage of the MOAHLFA(P) index and suggest consolidated definitions for its single items.

Methods: A title/abstract search in Medline identified publications mentioning the evolving acronyms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

While progress has been made in recent years, there are still no suitable and accepted , or models that can be used to accurately predict whether a chemical substance has the intrinsic property to cause immune-mediated chemical respiratory allergy, typically manifested as allergic asthma or allergic rhinitis which represents a severe health hazard. Regulatory authorities have relied primarily on clinical evidence (case reports, clinical databases, worker exposure studies) to classify substances as respiratory sensitizers, but this evidence can lack a proven immunological mechanism which is necessary to identify substances which can cause life-long sensitization and clinically relevant allergic symptoms in the respiratory tract in an exposed population (such respiratory allergens may be considered as "true" sensitizers, in analogy to the definition of skin sensitization, and in contrast to respiratory irritants). In light of this, the European Center for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals convened a Task Force to evaluate the types of clinical methods and data sources and the implications of relying on such data for regulatory decision making from a scientific perspective.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!