A review of records was conducted to examine the utility of doing routine laboratory testing (EEG and skull X rays) versus testing at the discretion of the attending neurologist on patients presenting for the nonpharmacological treatment of chronic headache. A total of 278 patients underwent neurological evaluation as part of a routine assessment prior to beginning self-regulatory treatment for headache. The first 112 subjects received routine laboratory tests of EEG and skull X-ray films. The second set of 166 subjects received laboratory tests only when deemed necessary by the neurologist. The rate of abnormal EEG in chronic headache sufferers was no greater than that found in the normal population, and only one or two potentially serious abnormalities were found on any laboratory test. A higher rate of abnormality was found when the CT scan was used in conjunction with clinical judgment. The majority of clients with abnormal laboratory tests (most of which were mildly abnormal) still saw substantial headache reduction with self-regulatory treatment for chronic headache. The authors suggest that routine laboratory testing may not be necessary and should be left to the discretion of a qualified neurologist.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00999075DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chronic headache
16
laboratory testing
12
routine laboratory
12
laboratory tests
12
neurological evaluation
8
eeg skull
8
treatment chronic
8
self-regulatory treatment
8
subjects received
8
laboratory
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!