Background: In September 2010, Vancouver, Canada enacted a smoke-free bylaw in parks and on beaches.
Objective: To examine demographic and attitudinal factors associated with the public opinion on Vancouver's outdoor smoke-free bylaw.
Methods: From 496 randomly selected Vancouver residents, information on demographics, smoking status, and opinions and support for or opposition to the smoke-free bylaw were obtained by telephone surveys.
Results: Approximately 84.2% of the sample endorsed the legislation; a greater proportion of non-smokers supported the bylaw than smokers (88.6% vs. 52.0%). In multivariate analysis, demographic variables significantly associated with supporting the smoke-free bylaw were being female, having completed community college/university or Post Graduate work (as compared to high school education or less), and being a nonsmoker. Furthermore, adjusting for demographic variables, all opinions regarding the smoke-free bylaw were significantly associated with its support, with the exception of the belief that the bylaw would increase stigma towards smokers.
Conclusion: These findings suggest strong public support in Vancouver for the smoke-free bylaw in parks and on beaches. Jurisdictions considering such legislation should address attitudes which can promote or hinder its adoption. Examination of such policy support on diverse groups within the population may enhance the development of equitable public health policy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.03.018 | DOI Listing |
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
October 2023
Faculty of Economy and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Background: Regulations in the form of Regional Regulations on Non-Smoking Areas are efforts to prevent smoking in schools. We will show qualitatively and quantitatively whether the policy can control smoke-free schools since 2015 in Muaro Jambi Regency. However, the implementation is still not optimal, even almost not implemented following the mandate of government regulation Number 109 of 2012 and regional regulation Number 5 of 2018.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSyst Rev
October 2022
School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Background: The impact of misinformation about vapes' relative harms compared with smoking may lead to increased tobacco-related burden of disease. To date, no systematic efforts have been made to chart interventions that mitigate vaping-related misinformation. We plan to conduct a scoping review that seeks to fill gaps in the current knowledge of interventions that mitigate vaping-related misinformation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Public Health
March 2022
Yale School of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, 135 College Street, Suite 323, New Haven, 06510, CT, USA.
Objective: News coverage around vaping-related events may have furthered misconceptions regarding the relative harms of vapes. Such information may influence the decisions of individuals who smoke, around switching to vaping, potentially affecting the overall tobacco mortality burden. Thus, it is prudent to study how news events (e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHealth Promot J Austr
January 2020
Health Promotion Service, Central Coast Local Health District, Gosford, NSW, Australia.
Issue Addressed: Smoking by patients, staff and visitors on the grounds of Central Coast Local Health District (CCLHD).
Methods: NSW Health introduced a smoke-free buildings and vehicles policy in 1988. A smoke-free grounds policy was implemented in 1999, and a smoke-free by-law adopted by CCLHD in 2013, making smoking on CCLHD grounds an offence.
Tob Control
November 2019
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
The Foundation for a Smoke-Free World was launched in September 2017 with an announced 12-year funding commitment of $1 billion from Philip Morris International (PMI). The Foundation claims that its governing documents (certificate of incorporation, bylaws and a pledge agreement) ensure that it has an independent research agenda and stringent protections from conflicts of interest. We analysed the text of these governing documents.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!