Background: The purpose of the study was to analyze the accuracy of interpretation of extremity traumas by emergency physicians (EP) to determine the most difficult areas for interpretation in comparison to official radiology reports of direct X-ray.

Methods: Radiologist reports and EP reports of direct X-rays from isolated extremity trauma patients were retrospectively compared from 01.05.2011 to 31.05.2011. A total of 181 fractures in 608 cases were confirmed.

Results: The locations of the misinterpreted fractures were ankle and foot (51.4%), wrist and hand (32.4%), elbow and forearm (5.4%), shoulder and upper arm (5.4%), hip and thigh (2.7%), and knee and leg (2.7%). The diagnostic accuracy of the EPs and radiologists were not significantly different (kappa=0.856, p=0.001).

Conclusion: Knowledge about the types of fractures that are most commonly missed facilitates a specifically directed educational effort.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5505/tjtes.2013.08555DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reports direct
8
overlooked extremity
4
fractures
4
extremity fractures
4
fractures emergency
4
emergency department
4
department background
4
background purpose
4
purpose study
4
study analyze
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!