Background: The purpose of this study is to report on cost, outcomes, reliability, and safety of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with symptomatic advanced rotator cuff deficiency.

Methods: Fifty-five primary RSA patients operated on at a single institution by a single surgeon were prospectively studied for a mean of 48 months (range, 31-71 months). For each patient, validated subjective and independently evaluated objective outcome data were collected to determine clinical reliability. In addition, safety, defined as major complications, as well as direct costs specific to each patient, were collected and analyzed.

Results: There were significant improvements (P < .05) in all clinical measures with the exception of the general health and vitality components as well as the mental component summary scores of the Short Form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2). In addition, the majority of the patients met the criteria set forth for clinical reliability (53 of 55 [96%]) and safety (49 of 55 [89%]). The mean total 4-year cost was $24,661, with the hospitalization accounting for 92% of this cost. Fiscal year was found to be responsible for the greatest fluctuation in total cost (P < .001). In addition, a lower comorbidity burden (P < .001), a higher preoperative extremity impairment rating (P < .001), higher postoperative role-emotional component scores on the SF-36v2 (P = .001), and lower postoperative social functioning component scores on the SF-36v2 (P = .005) were correlated with less cost.

Conclusion: The mean 4-year total cost of $24,661 allowed the purchase of treatment with RSA, leading to a greater than 5-fold reduction in pain and a 70% improvement in shoulder function with a small risk of harm.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reverse shoulder
8
shoulder arthroplasty
8
advanced rotator
8
rotator cuff
8
rsa patients
8
preparing bundled-payment
4
bundled-payment initiative
4
initiative cost
4
cost clinical
4
clinical outcomes
4

Similar Publications

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in revision surgery-Indications and results.

PLoS One

January 2025

Division of Arthroscopic and special Joint Surgery / Sports Injuries, Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Background: The number of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) procedures performed worldwide has increased over the last 10 years, with a corresponding increase in revision shoulder arthroplasty (SRSA). SRSA is often used for post-traumatic revision surgery in cases of infections and failure of anatomical prostheses. Data on outcomes with specific detail for each indication for the prosthetic solution as a secondary treatment are scarce, and inhomogeneous.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: For patients with osteoporosis and rotator cuff tears, there is still no consensus on current treatment methods. The material, structure, and number of anchors have important effects on the repair outcome.

Purpose: To investigate the use of chitosan quaternary ammonium salt-coated nickel-titanium memory alloy (NTMA) anchors to treat rotator cuff injury in shoulders with osteoporosis in a rabbit osteoporosis model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unlabelled: Introduction-Aim: Full-polyethylene glenosphere reverse shoulder arthroplasty (FP-RSA) known commonly as inverted-bearing concept utilizes a polyethylene glenosphere and metallic humeral liner. The aim was to assess mid-term outcomes of FP-RSA focusing on the incidence of scapular notching.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 24 consecutive primary FP-RSA performed between 2017 and 2020 was conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Deficient internal rotation after shoulder arthroplasty can inhibit specific essential activities of daily living that require behind-the-back arm positioning. Although postoperative internal rotation deficits occur, their impact on outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is not well established. Previous authors have validated the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) as a patient-reported assessment of acceptable outcomes of TSA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The optimal treatment for B2 glenoid morphology in young, active osteoarthritis patients is debated, with various options like hemiarthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and reverse TSA available, each having pros and cons.
  • Eccentric glenoid reaming can be effective but risks damaging the bone structure, potentially complicating future surgeries, while bone grafting, though beneficial for some, comes with high complication rates.
  • Reverse TSA offers a more stable alternative when correcting version and inclination proves difficult, as it adapts better to glenoid deformities and maintains functionality with reduced bone stock.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!