Introduction: The force applied to the teeth is a variable of orthodontic treatment that can be controlled. Poor control of the applied force can lead to adverse biologic effects as well as undesirable tooth movements. The selected archwire-bracket combination is a primary determining factor in the force level applied to a tooth during orthodontic treatment. The aim of this research was to use an experimental biomechanical setup to measure forces generated during complex orthodontic tooth movements with various archwire-bracket combinations.

Methods: The materials consisted of 3 types of 0.022-in slot orthodontic brackets: (1) conventional brackets (Victory Series [3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif] and Mini-Taurus [Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, Denver, Colo]), (2) self-ligating brackets (SmartClip [3M Unitek] and Time3 [American Orthodontics, Shegoygan, Wis]), and (3) a conventional low-friction bracket (Synergy [Rocky Mountain Orthodontics]); and 4 archwire types: (1) 0.012-in stainless steel (3M Unitek), (2) 0.0155-in coaxial (Advanced Orthodontics [Näpflein, Düsseldorf, Germany]), (3) 0.012-in Orthonol (Rocky Mountain Orthodontics), and (4) 0.012-in Thermalloy (Rocky Mountain Orthodontics). Stainless steel ligatures and elastomeric rings were used. The materials were used in different combinations in a simulated malocclusion that represented a maxillary central incisor displaced 2 mm gingivally (x-axis) and 2 mm labially (z-axis).

Results: The lowest forces were measured when the brackets were combined with either the coaxial or the Thermalloy archwires; the forces ranged from 3.4 ± 0.2 to 0.7 ± 0.1 N in the x-axis direction, and from 4.5 ± 0.3 to 0.5 ± 0.1 N in the z-axis direction. The highest forces were measured in combination with stainless steel archwires; the forces ranged from 6.3 ± 0.3 to 3.0 ± 0.1 N in the x-axis direction, and from 6.3 ± 0.3 to 1.7 ± 0.1 N in the z-axis direction.

Conclusions: We recommend 0.0155-in coaxial and 0.012-in Thermalloy archwires for leveling and alignment. Elastomeric rings, when used with conventional brackets, increased the force applied to the teeth.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.020DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mountain orthodontics
12
stainless steel
12
self-ligating brackets
8
force applied
8
applied teeth
8
orthodontic treatment
8
tooth movements
8
conventional brackets
8
[rocky mountain
8
00155-in coaxial
8

Similar Publications

The validity of teledentistry examinations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sydney, Australia.

Aust Dent J

December 2024

Nepean Centre for Oral Health, Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia.

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, non-urgent dental treatments were deferred. To identify and prioritize urgent dental patients, teledentistry was implemented across NSW public dental services. This study aimed to establish the validity of teledentistry examinations to provide a clinical diagnosis compared to face-to-face, clinical examination.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Awareness of orthodontic patients towards smartphone orthodontic apps.

Minerva Dent Oral Sci

June 2024

Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Odontostomatological Specialties, Luigi Vanvitelli University of Campania, Naples, Italy -

Article Synopsis
  • A study investigated the awareness and usage of orthodontic mobile applications among patients, discovering that only a small percentage were familiar with them despite high smartphone ownership.
  • Out of 700 surveyed orthodontic patients, 615 responded, revealing that 96% owned smartphones, with most preferring Apple devices and seeking treatment information mainly via social media, particularly YouTube.
  • Although only 3% knew about orthodontic apps and 12 had used one, 88% expressed willingness to adopt these tools for their treatment, highlighting a need for increased awareness and evaluation of app quality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Based Virtual Assistants in Responding to Frequently Asked Questions Related to Orthognathic Surgery.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg

August 2024

Senior Consultant, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharatpur Hospital, Bharatpur Chitwan, Nepal. Electronic address:

Background: Despite increasing interest in how conversational agents might improve health care delivery and information dissemination, there is limited research assessing the quality of health information provided by these technologies, especially in orthognathic surgery (OGS).

Purpose: This study aimed to measure and compare the quality of four virtual assistants (VAs) in addressing the frequently asked questions about OGS.

Study Design, Setting, And Sample: This in-silico cross-sectional study assessed the responses of a sample of four VAs through a standardized set of 10 questionnaires related to OGS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Evaluate the strength degradation of polymeric ligature chains after their immersion in cetylpyridinium chloride-based mouthwashes.

Methods: 240 elastomeric samples from four different manufacturers (Rocky Mountain®, Ormco®, Morelli® and Dentaurum®) in two types of configurations (with and without intermodular links) and divided in 3 groups (distilled water, Vitis CPC Protect® and PERIO·AID® 0.05%) at 5 follow-up periods (0-24 h, 7-14 -21 days) were immersed twice a day for 60 s, following the manufacturers' protocols.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The performance of artificial intelligence models in generating responses to general orthodontic questions: ChatGPT vs Google Bard.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

June 2024

Department of Orthodontics, Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Disease and Biomedical Sciences Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Higher Education, Chongqing, China. Electronic address:

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the performance of 2 artificial intelligence (AI) models, Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer-3.5 (ChatGPT-3.5; OpenAI, San Francisco, Calif) and Google Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (Google Bard; Bard Experiment, Google, Mountain View, Calif), in terms of response accuracy, completeness, generation time, and response length when answering general orthodontic questions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!