Background: Octreotide is generally administered based on the surgeon's interpretation of perceived risk for pancreatic fistula at the time of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
Methods: A single-institution, prospective randomized trial was conducted between April 2009 and December 2011 involving 62 PD patients who were randomized to receive octreotide (100 μg subcutaneously every 8 h; n = 32) or placebo (n = 30). Pancreatic juice output was measured after the operation using a catheter inserted into the pancreatic duct. Postoperative complications were recorded.
Results: No significant differences in median output were found between the octreotide (82.5 ml) and placebo (77.5 ml) groups (P = 0.538). Median total output was significantly lower in patients with adenocarcinoma compared with those with periampullary tumours (P = 0.004) and in patients with a duct diameter of >5 mm compared with those with a duct diameter of <5 mm (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in overall morbidity between the octreotide and placebo groups (P = 0.819). Grade B pancreatic fistula (International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula) was observed in two and three patients in the octreotide and placebo groups, respectively.
Conclusions: Morbidity did not differ significantly between the groups. This study did not demonstrate an inhibitory effect of octreotide on exocrine pancreatic secretion. Based on these results, the routine use of octreotide after PD cannot be recommended.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3633042 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00608.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!