A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Non-HDL-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol is a better predictor of metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance than apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1. | LitMetric

Background: The ratio of apolipoprotein B (apoB) to apolipoprotein A1 (apoA1) has been reported to be associated with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and insulin resistance (IR). Non-HDL-C is regarded as a surrogate marker for apoB in routine clinical practice. However, it is unclear whether the ratio of non-HDL-C to HDL-C is an equal or a better predictor than the apoB/apoA1 ratio for the identification of MetS and IR.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 41,821 Korean adults who participated in a routine health screening examination. Anthropometry, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, CRP, lipid profiles, apoB, and apoA1 were measured.

Results: To compare the predictive value for MetS between different lipid ratios, we analyzed the ROC curves of apoB/apoA1 and non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratios. ROC analysis showed that the AUCs of non-HDL-C/HDL-C (0.75 [95% CI=0.74-0.76] in men and 0.84 [95% CI=0.83-0.85] in women) were significantly higher than those of apoB/apoA1 (0.66 [95% CI=0.65-0.67] in men and 0.77 [95% CI=0.76-0.78] in women). The non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio also showed a significantly stronger association with HOMA-IR than the apoB/apoA1 ratio. The optimal cutoff value of the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio for detection of MetS in men was 3.39, with a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 71.8%, whereas the optimal ratio cutoff value in women was 2.89, with a sensitivity of 75.7% and a specificity of 78.1%.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio is a better marker than the apoB/apoA1 ratio for identifying IR and MetS in Koreans.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.03.027DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

apob/apoa1 ratio
12
non-hdl-c/hdl-c ratio
12
ratio
9
better predictor
8
metabolic syndrome
8
insulin resistance
8
mets
5
apob/apoa1
5
non-hdl-c/hdl-c
5
non-hdl-cholesterol/hdl-cholesterol better
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!