A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Chemiluminescence and ELISA-based serum assays for diagnosing and monitoring celiac disease in children: a comparative study. | LitMetric

Background: Anti-transglutaminase (tTG) or anti-deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP) serum determination is the first step in diagnosing celiac disease (CD). Our aims were to: compare the performance of novel chemiluminescent tool in the detection of tTG and DGP (Q-Flash®, Inova) with that of the established ELISA (Q-Lite®, Inova) methods; identify the more reliable index for making a sound diagnosis and monitoring therapy.

Methods: Using Q-Flash® and Q-Lite®, IgA and IgG class tTG and DGP were measured in the sera of 155 CD pediatric patients and 166 healthy age-matched controls. Forty-two of the patients had a follow-up one year after starting gluten free diet (GFD).

Results: Q-Flash® IgA tTG, the more accurate (intra-assay CV for low, intermediate and high values: 2.2%, 1.6%, and 1.1%; inter-assay CV: 2.8%, 4%, and 3%), sensitive (96.1%) and specific (97%) test for diagnosing CD, was the only variable to be significantly correlated with CD at binary logistic regression analysis (r=0.263, p<0.0001, Exp(B)=1.0506, 95% CI=1.0286-1.0731). Q-Flash® IgA tTG or DGP screen were more accurate than Q-Lite® IgA tTG in monitoring CD patients on GFD (p=0.003).

Conclusion: Q- Flash® IgA tTG measurement is an extremely precise, sensitive and specific index for not only diagnosing CD, but also monitoring therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2013.03.024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

celiac disease
8
ttg dgp
8
chemiluminescence elisa-based
4
elisa-based serum
4
serum assays
4
assays diagnosing
4
diagnosing monitoring
4
monitoring celiac
4
disease children
4
children comparative
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!