A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effects of growth on maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate. | LitMetric

Effects of growth on maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg

Département de chirurgie orthopédique et plastique pédiatrique, Hôpital Lapeyronie, CHRU, Montpellier, France; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

Published: December 2013

Purpose: The objective was to analyze the effects of growth on the long-term result of maxillary distraction osteogenesis (DO) in cleft lip and palate (CLP).

Patients And Methods: Retrospective study of 24 CLP cases with long-term follow-up operated for maxillary DO using the Polley and Figueroa technique: 10 patients were distracted during growth, while 14 patients were operated after their growth spurt. Preoperative (T0), 6-12 months postoperative (T1), and ≥4 years postoperative (T2) cephalometric radiographs were evaluated. A classical cephalometric analysis was used to assess the treatment stability, and a Procrustes superimposition method was performed to assess local changes in the maxilla and the mandible.

Results: At T0, the mean age was of 11.9 ± 1.4 years for growing patient, and 17.9 ± 3.5 years for patient treated after their growth spurt (P < 0.001). Between T0 and T1, a greater increase of the SNA was shown in growing patients (P = 0.036), but the relapse was more important between T1 and T2, with a significant decrease of the SNA (P = 0.002) and ANB (P = 0.032) compared to the patients treated after their growth spurt. Although not significant, growing patients showed greater rotations of their palatal plane and mandibular plane.

Conclusions: Maxillary DO in CLP does not correct the growth deficit inherent to the pathology. Overcorrection of at least 20% is advised during growth.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.01.038DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

effects growth
8
maxillary distraction
8
distraction osteogenesis
8
osteogenesis cleft
8
cleft lip
8
lip palate
8
growth spurt
8
growth maxillary
4
palate purpose
4
purpose objective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!