Objectives: To compare the listening effort expended by adolescents and young adults using implants versus their peers with normal hearing when these two groups are achieving similar speech perception scores. The study also aimed to compare listening effort expended by adolescents and young adults with bilateral cochlear implants when using two implants versus one.
Methods: Eight participants with bilateral cochlear implants and eight with normal hearing aged 10-22 years were included. Using a dual-task paradigm, participants repeated consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words presented in noise and performed a visual matching task. Signal-to-noise ratios were set individually to ensure the word perception task was challenging but manageable for all. Reduced performance on the visual task in the dual-task condition relative to the single-task condition was indicative of the effort expended on the listening task.
Results: The cochlear implant group, when using bilateral implants, expended similar levels of listening effort to the normal hearing group when the two groups were achieving similar speech perception scores. For three individuals with cochlear implants, and the group, listening effort was significantly reduced with bilateral compared to unilateral implants.
Discussion: The similar amount of listening effort expended by the two groups indicated that a higher signal-to-noise ratio overcame limitations in the auditory information received or processed by the participants with implants. This study is the first to objectively compare listening effort using two versus one cochlear implant. The results provide objective evidence that reduced listening effort is a benefit that some individuals gain from bilateral cochlear implants.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1754762812Y.0000000009 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Dual-Task Interference in the Assessment of Listening Effort Before and After Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Longitudinal Study.
J Speech Lang Hear Res
January 2025
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the magnitude and direction of dual-task interference in a listening effort dual-task paradigm in individuals with severe-to-profound hearing loss before and in the short- and long-term after cochlear implantation.
Design: The study sample consisted of 26 adult candidates for cochlear implantation with severe-to-profound hearing loss. The dual-task paradigm consisted of a primary speech understanding task, conducted in a quiet condition, and a favorable and unfavorable noise condition on the one hand and a secondary visual memory task on the other hand.
Individual differences elucidate the perceptual benefits associated with robust temporal fine-structure processing.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
January 2025
Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Article Synopsis
- The auditory system can precisely track quick changes in sound, but the importance of this ability (temporal fine structure or TFS) for hearing is still debated.
- Researchers studied 200 participants to see how TFS sensitivity affects speech perception in noisy environments.
- Results showed that better TFS sensitivity helped more with listening in reverberant spaces and led to quicker responses, suggesting it plays a key role in everyday hearing experiences.
An adaptive protocol to assess physiological responses as a function of task demand in speech-in-noise testing.
J Neurosci Methods
December 2024
Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, Milan, 20133, Italy. Electronic address:
Background: Acoustic challenges impose demands on cognitive resources, known as listening effort (LE), which can substantially influence speech perception and communication. Standardized assessment protocols for monitoring LE are lacking, hindering the development of adaptive hearing assistive technology.
New Method: We employed an adaptive protocol, including a speech-in-noise test and personalized definition of task demand, to assess LE and its physiological correlates.
Sensory representations and pupil-indexed listening effort provide complementary contributions to multi-talker speech intelligibility.
Sci Rep
December 2024
Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Multi-talker speech intelligibility requires successful separation of the target speech from background speech. Successful speech segregation relies on bottom-up neural coding fidelity of sensory information and top-down effortful listening. Here, we studied the interaction between temporal processing measured using Envelope Following Responses (EFRs) to amplitude modulated tones, and pupil-indexed listening effort, as it related to performance on the Quick Speech-in-Noise (QuickSIN) test in normal-hearing adults.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComparison of Performance for Cochlear-Implant Listeners Using Audio Processing Strategies Based on Short-Time Fast Fourier Transform or Spectral Feature Extraction.
Ear Hear
December 2024
Laboratorio de Audición Computacional y Piscoacústica, Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Objectives: We compared sound quality and performance for a conventional cochlear-implant (CI) audio processing strategy based on short-time fast-Fourier transform (Crystalis) and an experimental strategy based on spectral feature extraction (SFE). In the latter, the more salient spectral features (acoustic events) were extracted and mapped into the CI stimulation electrodes. We hypothesized that (1) SFE would be superior to Crystalis because it can encode acoustic spectral features without the constraints imposed by the short-time fast-Fourier transform bin width, and (2) the potential benefit of SFE would be greater for CI users who have less neural cross-channel interactions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!