Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828a0f6f | DOI Listing |
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi
November 2012
Maxillofacial Surgery Centre, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing.
Objective: To sum up three types of plastic procedures for frontal plagiocephaly Based on the principle of floating forehead, the plagiocephaly (unilateral coronal synostosis).
Methods: was corrected and orbito-frontal reconstruction was performed by orbito-frontal advancement, 'or temporoparietal osteotomy, or fronto-parietal osteotomy. The absorbable plates and microscrews composed of From January 2008 to polylactide polymers, were used to immobilize calvarial segments.
Childs Nerv Syst
September 2012
Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Craniofacial Unit, Paris, France.
Introduction: Trigonocephaly secondary to the premature fusion of the metopic synostosis is associated to a risk of cerebral compression and several craniofacial morphological alterations. Numerous surgical techniques have been proposed. They all carry a risk of secondary temporal hollowing
Purpose: The aim of this paper is to describe the surgical technique used for trigonocephaly at the craniofacial unit of Hopital Necker Enfants Malades (French National Referral Center for Faciocraniosynostosis) focusing on its advantages and limitations.
Childs Nerv Syst
September 2012
Craniofacial Unit, Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, APHP Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, 156 rue de Vaugirard, 75015, Paris, France.
The aim of this paper is to describe the surgical technique, originally devised by Dr. Renier which is currently used to treat children with scaphocephaly under 6 months of age at the Craniofacial Unit of Hopital Necker Enfants Malades (French National Referral Center for Faciocraniosynostosis), focusing on its advantages and limitations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlast Reconstr Surg
March 2012
Paris, France; and Amman, Jordan From the Craniofacial Unit, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Surgical Office.
Background: This report documents the authors' experience with 95 hypertelorism corrections performed since 1971. The authors note their findings regarding outcomes, preferred age at surgery, technique, and stability of results with growth.
Methods: Patients were classified into three groups: midline clefts (with or without nasal anomalies, Tessier 0 to 14); paramedian clefts (symmetric or asymmetric with or without nasal anomalies); and hypertelorism with craniosynostosis.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!