Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: The purpose of this commentary is to highlight several aspects of two main perspectives on sacrocolpopexy: surgical-which includes selection of a route for reconstructive surgery, types of surgical meshes available, advantages and disadvantages of each type of mesh, and the associated postoperative complication-and radiologic, that is, the role of imaging in improving outcome.
Conclusion: As new modalities and techniques related to sacrocolpopexy are developed, concepts of form and function change. With advances in imaging modalities, especially MRI and CT, and the postprocessing options available, the radiologist's role should extend beyond reporting imaging findings to sharing in the choice of the initial treatment plan.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.10218 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!