Multiple stressors, both abiotic and biotic, often are experienced simultaneously by organisms in nature. Responses to these stressors may share signaling pathways ("cross-talk") or protective mechanisms ("cross-tolerance"). Temperate and polar insects that must survive the winter experience low temperatures accompanied by additional abiotic stressors, such as low availability of water. Cold and desiccation have many similar effects at a cellular level, and we present evidence that the cellular mechanisms that protect against cold stress also protect against desiccation, and that the responses to cold and dehydration likely evolved as cross-tolerance. By contrast, there are several lines of evidence suggesting that low temperature stress elicits an upregulation of immune responses in insects (and vice versa). Because there is little mechanistic overlap between cold stress and immune stress at the cellular level, we suggest that this is cross-talk. Both cross-talk and cross-tolerance may be adaptive and likely evolved in response to synchronous stressors; however, we suggest that cross-talk and cross-tolerance may lead to different responses to changes in the timing and severity of multiple stress interactions in a changing world. We present a framework describing the potentially different responses of cross-tolerance and cross-talk to a changing environment and describe the nature of these impacts using interaction of cold-desiccation and cold-immunity in overwintering insects as an example.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icb/ict004 | DOI Listing |
Parasite
December 2023
Université de Rennes, CNRS, ECOBIO [(Écosystèmes, biodiversité, évolution)] - UMR 6553, 263 AVE du Général Leclerc, 35000 Rennes, France.
It is well established that environmental and biotic stressors like temperature and pathogens/parasites are essential for the life of small ectotherms. There are complex interactions between cold stress and pathogen infection in insects. Possible cross-protective mechanisms occur between both stressors, suggesting broad connectivity in insect stress responses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Exp Biol
June 2023
Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
Protective responses are pivotal in aiding organismal persistence in complex, multi-stressor environments. Multiple-stressor research has traditionally focused on the deleterious effects of exposure to concurrent stressors. However, encountering one stressor can sometimes confer heightened tolerance to a second stressor, a phenomenon termed 'cross-protection'.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF1) The first evidence of the beneficial impact of Long-Term-Heat-Acclimation (LTHA) on cardio-vascular compliance was the positive inotropic response and improved left ventricular (LV) compliance noted when isolated hearts from LTHA rats were studied. Human echo study demonstrates that passive HA affects the right ventricle and the atria as well. 2) There is a cross-talk between vascular and cardiac compliance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPest Manag Sci
January 2023
Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Agricultural insect pests display an exceptional ability to adapt quickly to natural and anthropogenic stressors. Emerging evidence suggests that frequent and varied sources of stress play an important role in driving protective physiological responses; therefore, intensively managed agroecosystems combined with climatic shifts might be an ideal crucible for stress adaptation. Cross-protection, where responses to one stressor offers protection against another type of stressor, has been well documented in many insect species, yet the molecular and epigenetic underpinnings that drive overlapping protective responses in insect pests remain unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntegr Org Biol
August 2022
School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, 100 Dairy Road, Eastlick G81, Pullman, WA99164, USA.
Accurate forecasting of organismal responses to climate change requires a deep mechanistic understanding of how physiology responds to present-day variation in the physical environment. However, the road to physiological enlightenment is fraught with complications: predictable environmental fluctuations of any single factor are often accompanied by substantial stochastic variation and rare extreme events, and several factors may interact to affect physiology. Lacking sufficient knowledge of temporal patterns of co-variation in multiple environmental stressors, biologists struggle to design and implement realistic and relevant laboratory experiments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!