AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the safety of five antiglaucoma medications and their effects based on different additives.
  • The methodology included testing these medications and three additives on cultured rabbit corneal cells to determine cell damage and corneal resistance.
  • Results showed tafluprost was the least harmful, while additives like BAK, HCO-40, and P-80 contributed to corneal injuries, with some formulations causing significant reductions in corneal resistance.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the safety of five types of antiglaucoma prostaglandin analog ophthalmic formulations, and to clarify their differences in accordance with contained additives (preservatives and surface-active agents).

Methods: THE FOLLOWING FIVE TYPES OF OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS AND THREE TYPES OF ADDITIVES WERE INVESTIGATED: latanoprost (Xalatan(®); latanoprost), tafluprost (Tapros(®); tafluprost), bimatoprost (Lumigan(®); bimatoprost), travoprost (Travatan(®); travoprost), travoprost (Travatan Z(®); travoprost-Z), benzalkonium chloride (BAK), polyoxyethylene hardening castor oil 40 (HCO-40), and polysorbate 80 (P-80). These experimental solutions were exposed to the cultured cells of a rabbit-derived corneal cell line for a certain time, and the exposure time causing 50% cell damage (CD50), indicated by the ratio of viable cells to total cells was calculated (in vitro). In addition, corneal resistance (CR) was measured and CR ratio (post-treatment CR/pretreatment CR × 100) was calculated (in vivo).

Results: CD50 of each ophthalmic solution was the longest with tafluprost, followed by travoprost-Z, bimatoprost, travoprost, and latanoprost. CD50 of 0.005%, 0.01%, and 0.02% BAK was 14.5 minutes, 8.1 minutes, and 4.0 minutes, respectively. The number of viable cells decreased to 60%, 8 minutes after exposure with HCO-40, and 30 minutes after being exposed to P-80. The CR ratio was 81.0% with travoprost and 82.0% with latanoprost, indicating a significant posttreatment reduction of CR (P < 0.05). The CR ratio did not decrease after treatment with tafluprost, travoprost-Z, or bimatoprost. The CR ratio of 0.005%, 0.01%, and 0.02% BAK was 105.0%, 90.5%, and 68.7%, respectively, and that of HCO-40 and P-80 was 108.7% and 114.2%, respectively.

Conclusion: BAK, HCO-40, and P-80 were thought to be involved in corneal injuries caused by each ophthalmic solution. Corneal injuries due to surface action were observed when using HCO-40 and P-80. When HCO-40 was combined with BAK, it induced micellar BAK and reduced corneal injuries by BAK.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3601024PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S40147DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hco-40 p-80
12
corneal injuries
12
antiglaucoma prostaglandin
8
prostaglandin analog
8
analog ophthalmic
8
ophthalmic formulations
8
bimatoprost travoprost
8
viable cells
8
ophthalmic solution
8
tafluprost travoprost-z
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to evaluate the safety of five antiglaucoma medications and their effects based on different additives.
  • The methodology included testing these medications and three additives on cultured rabbit corneal cells to determine cell damage and corneal resistance.
  • Results showed tafluprost was the least harmful, while additives like BAK, HCO-40, and P-80 contributed to corneal injuries, with some formulations causing significant reductions in corneal resistance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!