Objective: To examine real-world safety and treatment patterns of angiogenesis inhibitors for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) using observational data from two Spanish hospitals.

Methods: A retrospective medical record review was performed for 93 patients with a histological diagnosis of aRCC who received sunitinib, sorafenib, bevacizumab or temsirolimus as first-line angiogenesis inhibitor therapy, between January 2005 and September 2010 at two Spanish hospitals. Data were collected on adverse events (AEs), dosing to calculate relative dose intensity (RDI), treatment modifications and reasons for modifications.

Results: Sixty patients received sunitinib, 23 received sorafenib, 6 received bevacizumab, 1 received temsirolimus and 3 received a bevacizumab-temsirolimus combination. 91.7 and 100.0% of patients receiving sunitinib and sorafenib, respectively, experienced ≥ 1 AE; 40.0% and 43.5% had ≥ 1 grade 3/4 AE. Mean RDI for sunitinib and sorafenib were 0.866 (standard deviation (std) = 0.903) and 0.798 (std = 2.154), respectively. Among patients receiving sunitinib, 15.0% discontinued treatment, 43.3% had an interruption and 33.3% had a reduction due to AEs. For sorafenib, these rates were 4.3, 56.5 and 34.8%, respectively.

Conclusions: High rates of AEs were observed which resulted in high rates of treatment interruptions and dose reductions. These results suggest the need for additional treatment options for aRCC with improved tolerability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/14740338.2013.781581DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sunitinib sorafenib
12
safety treatment
8
treatment patterns
8
patterns angiogenesis
8
angiogenesis inhibitors
8
advanced renal
8
renal cell
8
cell carcinoma
8
received sunitinib
8
patients receiving
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!