AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare vaginal bleeding occurrences and patient satisfaction 12 months post-laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with and without endocervical excision.
  • Conducted as a randomized controlled trial at a Norwegian teaching hospital, it included 140 premenopausal women undergoing the procedure.
  • Results showed that while 33.1% experienced minimal vaginal bleeding, patient satisfaction was very high, with no significant differences between the two surgical approaches.

Article Abstract

Study Objective: To compare the occurrence of vaginal bleeding and patient satisfaction 12 months after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy performed with and without excision of the endocervix.

Design: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Design Classification: Canadian Task Force Classification I.

Setting: Norwegian university teaching hospital.

Patients: One hundred forty consecutive premenopausal women referred for hysterectomy on the basis of a benign condition.

Interventions: The study participants were randomized to standard laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (n = 70) or laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with excision of the endocervix in a reverse cone pattern (n = 70).

Measurements And Main Results: The main outcome measures were the occurrence of vaginal bleeding and patient satisfaction 12 months after the procedure. One hundred thirty women (92.3%) were followed up according to the study protocol. In total, 43 women (33.1%) reported bleeding episodes during the first 12 months after the laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy; 22 (16.9 %) of these women had cyclic bleeding. All reported bleeding episodes were minimal. Patient satisfaction after the hysterectomy was very high with a mean visual analog score (on a scale of 0-10) of 9.3 (standard deviation = 1.4). There were no significant differences between the 2 treatment groups regarding the main outcomes 12 months after the procedure.

Conclusion: The patient satisfaction after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy is very high. Episodes of minimal vaginal bleeding after the procedure are relatively common, but such bleeding does not affect patient satisfaction. Removal of the endocervix by reverse conization during laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy appears to have no effect in terms of reduced bleeding or improved patient satisfaction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.01.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laparoscopic supracervical
28
supracervical hysterectomy
28
patient satisfaction
24
vaginal bleeding
12
hysterectomy
9
hysterectomy performed
8
performed excision
8
excision endocervix
8
randomized controlled
8
occurrence vaginal
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study compares total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSCH) during minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy for treating uterovaginal prolapse.
  • Results showed no significant difference in overall recurrence of prolapse between the two methods, but TLH had lower odds of recurrence in multivariable analysis.
  • TLH had a higher proportion of mesh exposures with lightweight mesh, but this finding wasn't significant after adjusting for other factors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Failures and complications associated with treatments comprising laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (SHP) for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are unclear. We compared failure rates associated with SHP and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (SCH)/sacrocolpopexy (SCP) for advanced POP to determine whether they differed.

Methods: Clinical data of patients who underwent SHP (n = 52) and SCH/SCP (n = 209) were retrospectively examined.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Uterine fibroids are the most common indication for benign hysterectomy in the United States, but data regarding the association between hysterectomy type and outcomes for this indication are lacking.

Objective: This study aimed to describe the rate and odds of short-term (30 days) postoperative complications between patients who underwent minimally invasive total laparoscopic hysterectomy and those who underwent laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for uterine fibroids.

Study Design: This was a cohort study of prospectively collected data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Postoperative outcomes in minimally invasive total versus supracervical hysterectomy for endometriosis: a NSQIP study.

Arch Gynecol Obstet

October 2024

Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Purpose: To study the rate and odds of 30 day postoperative complications among patients undergoing minimally invasive total (TLH) compared to supracervical (LSCH) hysterectomy for endometriosis.

Study Design: A cohort study of patients with a diagnosis of endometriosis undergoing hysterectomy. We used prospectively collected data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Literature is lacking strong evidence about comparisons of efficacy and quality of life-related outcomes between laparoscopic total and/or supracervical hysterectomy (LTH/LSCH) with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) and minimally invasive sacrohysteropexy (LSH).

Objective: To summarize and compare available data on this topic providing a useful clinical tool in the treatment decision process.

Search Strategy: We performed a systematic research of PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, and Gooogle Scholar.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!