Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of an elastic element-based suit, called 'Regent Suit', in improving the recovery of motor and daily living activities in patients experiencing a subacute stroke.
Design: Randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Neurorehabilitation unit.
Subjects: Sixty patients with subacute stroke who were capable of walking without direct assistance were randomized to an experimental and control group.
Interventions: The experimental group attended 20 sessions of neuromotor exercises (e.g. sit-to-stand, balance, gait training) wearing the 'Regent Suit'; the control group performed the same exercises without the 'Regent Suit'.
Outcome Measures: 6-minute walking test, Berg Balance Scale, the Functional Independence Measure, and the Barthel Index. The participants were evaluated before and after training, and after a further six months.
Results: There were no significant between-group differences at baseline. A repeated measure linear mixed model revealed a significant effect of time (p < 0.001), group (p = 0.019), and time-by-group interaction (p < 0.001) in the gait speed in favour of the experimental group. The Berg Balance Scale indicated a significant effect of time (p < 0.001) and time-by-group interaction (p < 0.001). The experimental group also showed greater improvement in Functional Independence Measure and Barthel Index.
Discussion: The study findings showed that an intervention using the 'Regent Suit' is more effective than usual care in improving locomotion and daily living activities in patients with subacute stroke. Further studies might investigate the efficacy of this type of training in chronic stroke patients and the possibility of combining the suit with body weight-supported treadmill training.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215513478228 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Epidemiol
March 2024
College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Objectives: Clinical study reports (CSRs) are highly detailed documents that play a pivotal role in medicine approval processes. Though not historically publicly available, in recent years, major entities including the European Medicines Agency (EMA), Health Canada, and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have highlighted the importance of CSR accessibility. The primary objective herein was to determine the proportion of CSRs that support medicine approvals available for public download as well as the proportion eligible for independent researcher request via the study sponsor.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Treat Options Neurol
September 2019
Department of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Level 4, 29 Regent Street, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia.
Purpose Of Review: Two large-scale controlled clinical trials have provided Class I evidence for the benefit of deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a therapy for refractory epilepsy. However, the efficacy has been variable, with some patients not achieving any improvement in their seizure control. This disparity could be the result of suboptimal stimulation parameters/electrodes or alternatively a difference in the type of seizures being treated.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Phys Rehabil Med
October 2018
Department of Electric Engineering and Information Technologies (DIETI), School of Engineering, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Background: The recovery of the functional limb mobility of patients with cerebral damages can take great benefit of the role offered by proprioceptive rehabilitation. Recently have been developed a special Regent Suit (RS) for rehabilitative applications. Actually, there are preliminary studies which describes the effects of RS on gait recovery of stroke patients in acute stage, but none in chronic stage.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Med Res Methodol
August 2016
School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Background: Rapid reviews are of increasing importance within health technology assessment due to time and resource constraints. There are many rapid review methods available although there is little guidance as to the most suitable methods. We present three case studies employing differing methods to suit the evidence base for each review and outline some issues to consider when selecting an appropriate method.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Rehabil
September 2013
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Scientific Institute of Lissone, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation IRCCS, Italy.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of an elastic element-based suit, called 'Regent Suit', in improving the recovery of motor and daily living activities in patients experiencing a subacute stroke.
Design: Randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Neurorehabilitation unit.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!