A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Poly implant prothèse (PIP) breast implants: our experience. | LitMetric

Poly implant prothèse (PIP) breast implants: our experience.

Surgeon

Department of Plastic Surgery, Frenchay Hospital, Frenchay Park Road, Bristol BS16 1LE, UK. Electronic address:

Published: October 2013

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study reviewed the management of patients with PIP breast implants from 2000 to 2008, focusing on patient records to gather clinical presentation, investigations, management, and outcomes.
  • 44 patients, primarily asymptomatic, showed various symptoms, with 21.8% of implants noted to be ruptured, leading to differing management approaches, including explantation and exchange of implants.
  • Findings emphasize the need for thorough patient counseling regarding the risks of rupture and the importance of monitoring after surgery.

Article Abstract

Introduction: This study describes our experience on the management of patients with PIP (Poly Implant Prothèse) breast implants between 2000 and 2008.

Materials And Methods: The medical records of patients were reviewed. Data was collected on clinical presentation, investigations, management and outcome.

Results: 44 patients, with bilateral breast implants, and a median age of 33 years (18-54 years), were reviewed, and of these, 31 patients were asymptomatic. Symptoms at presentation included lymphadenopathy, capsule formation, breast lump, seroma and breast pain. Patients underwent mammography, ultrasound and MRI scanning of the breasts as part of the imaging investigations. 5 patients declined explantation. Reasons for explantation included patient anxiety, silent rupture, aesthetic breast change, palpable nodes and breast lump. 17 out of a total of 78 implants (21.8%) were noted to have ruptured; 2 had a simple tear and 15 were totally disintegrated. 1 patient underwent removal of the implants, 18 underwent exchange of implants, and 20 patients had a capsulotomy and exchange of implants. Postoperative complications included wound infection, seroma, axillary lymphadenopathy, hypersensitive scar and overgranulation of the wound.

Conclusion: Our series confirms the high rate of PIP implant rupture (21.8%), the majority of which were asymptomatic. The main reasons for explantation were patient anxiety and silent rupture of implants. It is imperative that patients should be appropriately counselled, prior to surgery with regards to removal of the implants, given the increased rupture rates noted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2013.02.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast implants
12
implants
9
poly implant
8
implant prothèse
8
patients
8
breast lump
8
reasons explantation
8
patient anxiety
8
anxiety silent
8
silent rupture
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!