What Is Known And Objective: Prescribing sulfonamide-containing medications for patients with sulfonamide allergy continues to complicate medical decisions. We examined the cautionary recommendations in the approved drug monographs and primary literature, and formulated an evidence-based grading of cautionary recommendations for sulfonamide allergy and cross-reactivity among sulfonamide-containing medications.
Methods: Drug monographs were collected from six countries and three drug compendia. Two reviewers independently extracted the data from the contraindication, warning and/or precaution sections of drug monographs. Evidence for cross-reactivity was examined in the primary literature and compared with drug monograph recommendations. Consequently, medications were categorized based on the strength of recommendation and level of evidence by consensus.
Results And Discussion: We identified wide variability in cautionary recommendations ranging from no warning or precaution to contraindication among the sources reviewed. The recommendations were located mainly in the contraindication section of monographs for France (65·2%), United Kingdom (51·9%), Italy (50·0%), South Korea (43·5%), United States (38·2%) and Canada (37·0%), whereas in drug compendia, the recommendations were found in the precaution section for Martindale (51·4%) and Micromedex-Drugdex (33·3%), and contraindication and precaution section for the American Hospital Formulary Service Drug Information 2010 (30·8%). Evidence from the primary literature varied with recommendation included in drug monographs. Evidence-based categorization was carried out for 16 medications. Two sulfonamide-moiety-containing drugs were considered safe, six non-sulfonylarylamines required precaution, and eight medications from all three sulfonamide chemical classes were considered mostly unsafe.
What Is New And Conclusion: There are significant discrepancies in cautionary recommendations included in drug-labels and drug compendia. Statements concerning cross-reactive hypersensitivity with other sulfonamides generally suggest theoretical possibilities. The consensus evidence-based grading instrument developed may be useful for deriving cautionary recommendations for sulfonamide-allergic patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12048 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Med
November 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90333, USA.
J Exp Psychol Gen
October 2024
Department of Psychology, Julius-Maximilians-Universitat Wurzburg.
Bayes factor analysis becomes increasingly popular, among other reasons, because it allows to provide evidence for the null hypothesis, which is not easily possible with the traditional frequentist approach. A conceivable strategy that apparently takes favorable aspects of both approaches on board is to use traditional frequentist analyses first and to support theoretically interesting nil effects by Bayesian analyses thereafter. Here, we asked whether such a selective application of Bayesian analyses to only nonsignificant effects of foregoing frequentist analyses creates bias.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiol Pharm Bull
October 2024
Department of Clinical Medicine (Pharmaceutical Medicine), Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University.
The elderly Japanese population is growing rapidly due to increasing longevity and declining birth rates. These findings have implications for drug development and safety in elderly patients; however, the Japanese stakeholders have been slow to adapt. This study aimed at examining methods for providing sufficient information on safe use of pharmaceuticals in elderly patients in Japan.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
January 2025
University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida. Electronic address:
I have read with great interest the Letter to the Editor by dosReis et al. in response to my Editorial on the impact of policy on children's mental health. Though I wholeheartedly agree with the perspectives and recommendations made by the authors, I do have to offer cautionary caveats to their proposals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNutrients
August 2024
Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, & Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185 Rome, Italy.
According to the main international guidelines, patients with obesity and psychiatric/psychological disorders who cannot be addressed to surgery are recommended to follow a nutritional approach and a psychological treatment. A total of 94 patients (T0) completed a battery of self-report measures: Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11), Binge-Eating Scale (BES), Obesity-Related Well-Being Questionnaire-97 (ORWELL-97), and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Then, twelve sessions of a brief psychodynamic psychotherapy were delivered, which was followed by the participants completing the follow-up evaluation (T1).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!