Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The use of multi-category scales is increasing for the monitoring of IEP goals, classroom and school rules, and Behavior Improvement Plans (BIPs). Although they require greater inference than traditional data counting, little is known about the inter-rater reliability of these scales. This simulation study examined the performance of nine reliability indices applied to six multi-category scales of different gradations (2, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 15 points) all derived from the same quasi-continuous (1-30) data. The researchers find that each index behaves differently and requires its own interpretation; there is no one-best reliability indices as most indices are scale-dependent. Finally, index values do not remain constant when more categories are collapsed to fewer. New guidelines are needed for optimal methods of obtaining reliability with ordinal scales.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.12.003 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!