AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this trial was to assess if the nonremoval of abutments placed at the time of surgery would improve bone and gingival healing around single immediately restored implants placed in postextraction sockets.

Materials And Methods: All patients received a single square-threaded tapered implant placed in postextraction sockets and immediately restored. All the implants were placed 2.0 mm below the bone crest, avoiding any contact with the coronal portion of the buccal wall. Six months after surgery, 35 patients were treated following the control standard prosthetic protocol: the abutments were removed and impressions were made directly on the implant platform. Thirty-three patients underwent the "one abutment at one time" test protocol: impressions were made of the abutments using snap-on abutment copies. The dimensional changes of the soft and hard tissues were assessed using digital photography and cone beam computed tomography radiographs immediately after surgery and at 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up examinations.

Results: All implants were osseointegrated and clinically stable at the follow-up examinations. No statistically significant difference was evidenced between the two groups regarding the measurement of vertical bone healing. After the placement of the final restoration, a significant horizontal loss in the hard tissue portion over the implant platform was assessed (p = .03 mesial sites; p = .04 distal sites). An 87% increase of the mean recession of the buccal soft tissue was observed in the control group (+0.27 mm) in the same time frame.

Conclusions: The nonremoval of abutments placed at the time of the surgery improves the stability of healed soft and hard tissues around the immediately restored, subcrestally placed tapered single maxillary implant.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12051DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nonremoval abutments
12
tapered single
8
abutments time
8
time surgery
8
restored implants
8
implant platform
8
soft hard
8
hard tissues
8
abutments cases
4
cases involving
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: To compare immediately loaded post-extractive single implants using a definitive abutment versus provisional abutment later replaced by custom-made abutment.

Materials And Methods: In two private clinics, 28 patients in need of one single post-extractive implant in the maxilla or mandible from the left second premolar to the right second premolar area were randomised shortly before tooth extraction to provisional abutment (PA) and definitive abutment (DA) groups. Three patients had to be excluded for buccal wall fracture after tooth extraction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The aim of this trial was to assess if the nonremoval of abutments placed at the time of surgery would improve bone and gingival healing around single immediately restored implants placed in postextraction sockets.

Materials And Methods: All patients received a single square-threaded tapered implant placed in postextraction sockets and immediately restored. All the implants were placed 2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To compare bone resorption around implants immediately loaded and restored using definitive abutments versus provisional abutments later replaced by custom-made abutments up to 12 months after implant placement.

Materials And Methods: 28 patients with partial edentulism were selected for a two-implant supported immediate restoration and randomised to provisional abutment (PA) and definitive abutment (DA) groups (14 patients for each group). In the PA group, implants were immediately restored using a platform-switched provisional titanium abutment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the effects of abutment removal after 6 months on bone healing after the subcrestal placement of immediately restored, tapered implants in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism.

Material And Methods: Each of the 24 patients with partial posterior mandibular edentulism was consecutively treated with two immediately restored 3.5 mm diameter tapered implants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!