Background: Patient isolation using contact precautions has gained widespread use to halt MRSA transmission, however supportive data is scarce and concerns regarding patient safety and satisfaction have been raised. At our institution, MRSA patients are isolated on a dedicated ward (cohort isolation), rather than in separate rooms. Our objectives were (1) to determine the proportion of bedside medical visits to patients on an isolation ward, (2) to quantify complications in those patients and (3) to determine if those complications are related to isolation and if they can be prevented.
Methods: This retrospective case-control study was performed on the two sites of a tertiary teaching hospital in Sherbrooke, QC, Canada. We matched MRSA patients with an admission diagnosis of heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to similar non-isolated controls. The proportion of bedside visits was ascertained through the number of progress notes with subjective elements or with a physical examination. Complications were sought through an extensive file review, and events were analysed according to Baker's CAES causality and preventability scales.
Results: Overall, 111 patient pairs were analysed (35 with heart failure and 76 with COPD). Isolated patients received less bedside visits (subjective notes/1,000 patient-days: 849.6 vs. 983.3, p = 0,001). Attending physicians (454.5 vs. 451.4, p = 0,02) and residents (347.0 vs. 416.9, p = 0.01) are responsible for this discrepancy, while medical students appear to visit isolated and non-isolated patients equally (116.5 vs. 114.9, p = 0.90). Isolated patients showed a tendency towards longer stay and more preventable complications, although no difference in the total number of complications was observed.
Conclusion: Isolated patients have less documented care that suggests less bedside visits from the medical staff, which could hamper the therapeutical relationship. Further studies are needed to explain this finding.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3581535 | PMC |
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0057057 | PLOS |
Am J Emerg Med
November 2024
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
Background: The value of routine bedside lung ultrasound (LUS) for predicting patient disposition during visits to the Emergency Department (ED) is difficult to quantify. We hypothesized that a simplified scoring of bedside-acquired LUS images for the triage of acute respiratory symptoms in the ED would be associated with patient disposition.
Methods: For this observational pragmatic study, we reviewed prospectively-collected bedside LUS images from patients presenting to the ED with acute respiratory symptoms.
Aust Crit Care
December 2024
Department of Intensive Care, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Children (Basel)
November 2024
Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
November 2024
Clinical Medical Center of Oncology, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200071, China.
Background: Lung cancer is characterized by high morbidity and mortality due to the lack of practical early diagnostic and prognostic tools. The present study uses machine learning algorithms to construct a clinical predictive model for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
Methods: Laboratory indices of the NSCLC patients at their initial visit were collected for quality control and exploratory analysis.
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia
November 2024
Clinical and Diagnostic Services, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!